Bug#747948: Reply to suggestion

2014-05-19 Thread Pierre-Elliott Bécue
On lun. 19 mai 2014 à 15:30:23, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > On Mon, 19 May 2014 14:34:40 +0200, David Guyot wrote: > > Pierre-Elliott, > > > > Thanks for your reply. Your offer seems correct to me; nevertheless, > > regarding your second proposition, why would the warning be only > > displayed w

Bug#747948: Reply to suggestion

2014-05-19 Thread Pierre-Elliott Bécue
On Mon, 19 May 2014 14:34:40 +0200, David Guyot wrote: > Pierre-Elliott, > > Thanks for your reply. Your offer seems correct to me; nevertheless, > regarding your second proposition, why would the warning be only > displayed with the verbose flag? I mean, doesn't it worth the trouble to > always d

Bug#747948: Reply to suggestion

2014-05-19 Thread David Guyot
Pierre-Elliott, Thanks for your reply. Your offer seems correct to me; nevertheless, regarding your second proposition, why would the warning be only displayed with the verbose flag? I mean, doesn't it worth the trouble to always display this warning, even without -v, given the relatively small am