Bug#747141: Bug#748304: tupi: not binNMU safe

2014-05-17 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Sat, 17 May 2014 10:45:54 Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > With the current use of dh_installdocs --link-doc you loose the binNMU > changelog entry. However obvious it suppose to be it only occured to me when I read it. You're right, thank you, I will fix. -- All the best, Dmitry Smirnov. signa

Bug#747141: Bug#748304: tupi: not binNMU safe

2014-05-17 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2014-05-17 11:05:48, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > On Fri, 16 May 2014 15:52:04 Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > The problem is that tupi-data (= ${binary:Version}) > > appears in tupi's ${misc:Depends}. > > Thank you for excellent diagnosis. I believe this problem inherited from > debhelper's #747141.

Bug#747141: Bug#748304: tupi: not binNMU safe

2014-05-16 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Fri, 16 May 2014 15:52:04 Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > The problem is that tupi-data (= ${binary:Version}) > appears in tupi's ${misc:Depends}. Thank you for excellent diagnosis. I believe this problem inherited from debhelper's #747141... Let's see what debhelper maintainers will say about th