Bug#745233: libhogweed2: should have versioned depend on newer libgmp10

2014-04-26 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 21:24:17 +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > tisdagen den 22 april 2014 22.12.24 skrev Steve M. Robbins: > > I think I understand the rationale for using the super-fine-grained symbol > > versioning. If someone from the debian-science-maintainers team would like > > to mainta

Bug#745233: libhogweed2: should have versioned depend on newer libgmp10

2014-04-24 Thread Magnus Holmgren
tisdagen den 22 april 2014 22.12.24 skrev Steve M. Robbins: > I think I understand the rationale for using the super-fine-grained symbol > versioning. If someone from the debian-science-maintainers team would like > to maintain this file, please go ahead and commit it to the repository. > Unfortu

Bug#745233: libhogweed2: should have versioned depend on newer libgmp10

2014-04-22 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Well, Thank you. On April 21, 2014 04:56:21 PM Niels Möller wrote: > Magnus Holmgren writes: > > Oh well, I went ahead and did it for you. However, as you can see, some > > symbols went missing in both 5.1 and 6.0. > > Are those the ones in the #MISSING: lines in your file? They are all > undoc

Bug#745233: libhogweed2: should have versioned depend on newer libgmp10

2014-04-21 Thread Niels Möller
Magnus Holmgren writes: > Oh well, I went ahead and did it for you. However, as you can see, some > symbols went missing in both 5.1 and 6.0. Are those the ones in the #MISSING: lines in your file? They are all undocumented internal functions in GMP. Regards, /Niels -- Niels Möller. PGP-encr

Bug#745233: libhogweed2: should have versioned depend on newer libgmp10

2014-04-20 Thread Magnus Holmgren
söndagen den 20 april 2014 12.53.02 skrev Steve M. Robbins: > So to be sure: adding "-V" is the right thing to do here? You should add "-V libgmp10 (>= 6.0.0)" and keep it that way until further symbols are added. But preferably you should create a symbols file so that packages that don't use t

Bug#745233: libhogweed2: should have versioned depend on newer libgmp10

2014-04-20 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On April 20, 2014 06:59:31 PM Magnus Holmgren wrote: > reassign 745233 libgmp10 > retitle 745233 libgmp10: Wrong shlibs information after 6.0.0 adds new > symbols affects 745233 libhogweed2 > thanks > > söndagen den 20 april 2014 12.55.09 Ivo De Decker: > > On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 01:14:18AM +0200

Bug#745233: libhogweed2: should have versioned depend on newer libgmp10

2014-04-20 Thread Magnus Holmgren
reassign 745233 libgmp10 retitle 745233 libgmp10: Wrong shlibs information after 6.0.0 adds new symbols affects 745233 libhogweed2 thanks söndagen den 20 april 2014 12.55.09 Ivo De Decker: > On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 01:14:18AM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > > That kind of thing should never happen

Bug#745233: libhogweed2: should have versioned depend on newer libgmp10

2014-04-20 Thread Ivo De Decker
Hi Magnus, On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 01:14:18AM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > lördagen den 19 april 2014 15.21.21 skrev Ivo De Decker: > > The new nettle upload contains a version of libhogweed2 which uses symbols > > from the new version (6.0.0) of libgmp10, but it doesn't have a versioned > > d

Bug#745233: libhogweed2: should have versioned depend on newer libgmp10

2014-04-19 Thread Ivo De Decker
package: libhogweed2 version: 2.7.1-2 severity: serious Hi, The new nettle upload contains a version of libhogweed2 which uses symbols from the new version (6.0.0) of libgmp10, but it doesn't have a versioned dependency. This means it's possible to install libhogweed2 with an older version of lib