Bug#744718: pu: samba4/4.0.0~beta2+dfsg1-3.2+deb7u1

2014-04-16 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + pending On 2014-04-16 17:51, Ivo De Decker wrote: On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 11:39:09PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: package: winbind4 version: 4.0.0~beta2+dfsg1-3.2+deb7u1 architecture: amd64 essential: false unsat-dependency: samba4 (= 4.0.0~beta

Bug#744718: pu: samba4/4.0.0~beta2+dfsg1-3.2+deb7u1

2014-04-16 Thread Ivo De Decker
Adam, On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 11:39:09PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2014-04-13 at 23:52 +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 09:48:59PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > > The samba4 package in wheezy is not suitable for usage in a production > > > > environment.

Bug#744718: pu: samba4/4.0.0~beta2+dfsg1-3.2+deb7u1

2014-04-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2014-04-13 at 23:52 +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote: > On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 09:48:59PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > The samba4 package in wheezy is not suitable for usage in a production > > > environment. It should not have been released with wheezy. [...] > > Other than that, please

Bug#744718: pu: samba4/4.0.0~beta2+dfsg1-3.2+deb7u1

2014-04-13 Thread Ivo De Decker
Hi Russ, On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 01:18:41PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > > The samba4 package in wheezy is not suitable for usage in a production > > environment. It should not have been released with wheezy. > > It's possible that you've already done this, but if not, I recommend also > coordina

Bug#744718: pu: samba4/4.0.0~beta2+dfsg1-3.2+deb7u1

2014-04-13 Thread Ivo De Decker
Hi Adam, On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 09:48:59PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > The samba4 package in wheezy is not suitable for usage in a production > > environment. It should not have been released with wheezy. > > + To use the samba AD DC functionality, a newer version of samba is > + neces

Bug#744718: pu: samba4/4.0.0~beta2+dfsg1-3.2+deb7u1

2014-04-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Sun, 2014-04-13 at 22:08 +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote: > The attached patch removes the samba4 binary package. Please accept it for > wheezy, even though it's clear that this is not a nice option. Indeed, it's not great, but it may well be the least bad option availa

Bug#744718: pu: samba4/4.0.0~beta2+dfsg1-3.2+deb7u1

2014-04-13 Thread Russ Allbery
Ivo De Decker writes: > The attached patch removes the samba4 binary package. Please accept it > for wheezy, even though it's clear that this is not a nice option. > The samba4 source package in wheezy contains a beta version of samba > 4.0. Most samba functionality is disabled in this package,

Bug#744718: pu: samba4/4.0.0~beta2+dfsg1-3.2+deb7u1

2014-04-13 Thread Ivo De Decker
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: wheezy User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Dear release team, The attached patch removes the samba4 binary package. Please accept it for wheezy, even though it's clear that this is not a nice option. The samba4 source pa