[ re-sent because I forgot to cc the BTS ]
On Thursday 10 April 2014 13:22:45 you wrote:
> I consider this a problem because it's a lot of packages that simply are
> not going to be used on these systems.
Yes. A few MB of disks are wasted. Even on ARM system running on a SD card,
this is no long
On 09/04/14 19:14, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> Hello
>
> On Monday 07 April 2014 16:44:47 you wrote:
>> Together, these are responsible for pulling in 53 PERL packages as
>> dependencies of lcdproc on my system. I feel that this is excessive,
>> especially considering the relatively minor functional
Hello
On Monday 07 April 2014 16:44:47 you wrote:
> Together, these are responsible for pulling in 53 PERL packages as
> dependencies of lcdproc on my system. I feel that this is excessive,
> especially considering the relatively minor functionality that these
> packages provide (namely, to be abl
Package: lcdproc
Version: 0.5.6-1
Severity: normal
Dear maintainer,
The version of lcdproc currently in sid depends on two new packages:
- libconfig-model-lcdproc-perl (>= 2.040)
- libconfig-model-perl (>= 2.037)
Together, these are responsible for pulling in 53 PERL packages as dependencies
of
4 matches
Mail list logo
