On Sun, 6 Apr 2014, Pino Toscano wrote:
What's the use case for marking libpoppler-dev as m-a: same?
Uh, so I can cross-compile stuff? (aka "gcc -m32" in the simplest case)
Alone it has no value in being so.
Even with libpoppler-private-dev?
Some dependencies may not be multiarch yet (qt
severity 743817 wishlist
thanks
Hi,
On 2014-04-06 21:13, Marc Glisse wrote:
Package: libpoppler-dev
Version: 0.24.5-3
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
it is good that libpoppler44 is Multi-Arch: same (thanks), but it
would
be even better if the -dev packages were as well. libpoppler-dev has
Package: libpoppler-dev
Version: 0.24.5-3
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
it is good that libpoppler44 is Multi-Arch: same (thanks), but it would
be even better if the -dev packages were as well. libpoppler-dev has all
its content in /usr/lib/$arch (except for changelog and copyright), so
it se
3 matches
Mail list logo
