Bug#743525: symlink permissions misdescribed

2016-03-12 Thread Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
tags 715261 fixed-upstream thanks Yes, there are odd exceptions. Under /proc/PID, there are some "magic" symlinks that have other permissions. I"ve added some text to the man page to note this. Thanks for the report. On Linux, the permissions of a symbolic link are not used in an

Bug#743525: symlink permissions misdescribed

2014-04-03 Thread Simon Paillard
Control: tag -1 +confirmed +upstream On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 04:51:15PM +0100, Zefram wrote: > Package: manpages > Version: 3.44-1 > Severity: minor > > symlink(7) says: >On Linux, the permissions of a symbolic link are not used in any opera- >tions; the permissions are always 077

Bug#743525: symlink permissions misdescribed

2014-04-03 Thread Zefram
Package: manpages Version: 3.44-1 Severity: minor symlink(7) says: On Linux, the permissions of a symbolic link are not used in any opera- tions; the permissions are always 0777 (read, write, and execute for all user categories), and can't be changed. but in reality: $ l