Bug#741637:

2014-03-17 Thread Olly Betts
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 07:28:25AM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote: > > I've asked in #debian-ftp to avoid me raising libxapian22's priority > > and then discovering they'd prefer to demote aptitude instead. > > thanks for feedback. I'm not clear about your chatt.. ftpmaster sees > that as a bug in apt

Bug#741637: libxapian22: Please raise package priority to "important"

2014-03-16 Thread Tobias Frost
Control: -1 affects aptitude Control: 741635 affects aptitude (sorry, hitted send accidentially; I just wanted to comment my view on the policy.) > While this certainly needs addressing, and I'm fine with changing > libxapian22 if that's what if preferred, policy doesn't appear to > justify filin

Bug#741637:

2014-03-16 Thread Tobias Frost
Hi Olly, > I've asked in #debian-ftp to avoid me raising libxapian22's priority > and then discovering they'd prefer to demote aptitude instead. > Cheers, >Olly thanks for feedback. I'm not clear about your chatt.. ftpmaster sees that as a bug in aptitude and likes to demote aptidue from

Bug#741637: libxapian22: Please raise package priority to "important"

2014-03-16 Thread Olly Betts
Severity: important thanks On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 07:12:48PM +0100, coldtobi wrote: > during testing of a script to check for Policy 2.5 requirments, I saw that > aptitude (priority important) > depends on libxapian22 (Prioity optional). > > Quoting the policy: > Packages must not depend on pac

Bug#741637: libxapian22: Please raise package priority to "important"

2014-03-14 Thread coldtobi
Package: libxapian22 Version: 1.2.17-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.5 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, during testing of a script to check for Policy 2.5 requirments, I saw that aptitude (priority important) depends on libxapian22 (Prioity optional). Quoting the