[Steve Langasek]
> Are you going to remove nfs and cifs as well?
I did not plan to change the existing ones, no, as getting it right
during upgrades is going to be very hard. But I am not conviced it is
a good idea to introduce more special handling in initscripts.
> I don't think requiring use
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:27:27AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Vincent Caron]
> > It works, thanks, nice workaround.
> Good. It is not really a workaround, it is the recommended way to do
> it. :)
> > Wouldn't it be nicer if GlusterFS was supported ouf-of-the-box just
> > like Ceph, C
[Vincent Caron]
> It works, thanks, nice workaround.
Good. It is not really a workaround, it is the recommended way to do
it. :)
> Wouldn't it be nicer if GlusterFS was supported ouf-of-the-box just
> like Ceph, Coda and the others ?
Personally, I believe it would be better if the need to upd
On 12/03/2014 01:49, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Did you try to add the _netdev option to the glusterfs entry in
> /etc/fstab?
It works, thanks, nice workaround.
Wouldn't it be nicer if GlusterFS was supported ouf-of-the-box just
like Ceph, Coda and the others ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
[Vincent Caron]
> upon recently installing a GlusterFS cluster, I realized that while
> an entry for the 'glusterfs' filesystem type in /etc/fstab works all
> right, it would not properly mount at boot. Because initscripts
> considered it a local filesystem and tried to mount it before the
> networ
Package: initscripts
Version: 2.88dsf-51
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
upon recently installing a GlusterFS cluster, I realized that while an
entry for the 'glusterfs' filesystem type in /etc/fstab works all right,
it would not properly mount at boot. Because initscripts considere
6 matches
Mail list logo
