Am 26.08.2014 13:47, schrieb Eric Valette:
> Will see and confirm when back home. If this is confirmed, it means a
> policy when transitionning from sysv init script to systemd init should
> do a update-rc.d remove
No, it doesn't mean *in general* that update-rc.d remove should be run.
The case o
On 08/26/2014 01:30 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Is this a wheezy upgrade?
Not per se (I always run unstable + experimental) but result is the same
given the time slot.
> IIRC in wheezy, the samba package used a singel /etc/init.d/samba sysv
> init script, which was enabled by default.
Yes it was
On 08/26/2014 01:47 PM, Eric Valette wrote:
> I think I have already suffered a bug like that with nfs-common (with
> rpcbind dependencies )and found that the links were indeed not removed
> causing insserv to fail. See #740018 or #706877
In fact this was 746170
-- eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
Am 26.08.2014 13:07, schrieb Eric Valette:
> On 08/26/2014 12:21 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Am 26.08.2014 11:48, schrieb Eric Valette:
>>> Could you please do something to integrate samba and systemd properly! I
>>> bet it
>>> has already been done on other distributions.
>>
>> Why is the /etc/i
On 08/26/2014 12:21 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 26.08.2014 11:48, schrieb Eric Valette:
>> Could you please do something to integrate samba and systemd properly! I bet
>> it
>> has already been done on other distributions.
>
> Why is the /etc/init.d/samba init script enabled at all?
> There sh
Am 26.08.2014 11:48, schrieb Eric Valette:
> Could you please do something to integrate samba and systemd properly! I bet
> it
> has already been done on other distributions.
Why is the /etc/init.d/samba init script enabled at all?
There should only be a /etc/init.d/samba script, no symlinks in
Could you please do something to integrate samba and
systemd properly! I bet it has already been done on other
distributions.
Question for michael were is the per daemon waiting time
configurable?
-- eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
7 matches
Mail list logo
