Bug#740386: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#740386: Bug#740386: Bug#740386: Bug#740386: More robust piuparts results reporting format

2014-03-19 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Dave, On Dienstag, 4. März 2014, Dave Steele wrote: > The current precise definition is a bit obtuse in this context - DDPO > sorts these strings, for use in a tooltip, in a particular order > relative to each other, vs. alphabetical for all others. It's a bit > presumptuous to say that in the

Bug#740386: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#740386: Bug#740386: Bug#740386: More robust piuparts results reporting format

2014-03-03 Thread Dave Steele
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: > control: tags -1 + pending > > + ...The names > + "unstable", "testing", "stable", "oldstable", and "experimental" > + have special meaning. > > yet this text lacks an explaination what the special meaning is. can you > explain and add that pl

Bug#740386: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#740386: Bug#740386: More robust piuparts results reporting format

2014-03-02 Thread Holger Levsen
control: tags -1 + pending Hi Dave, thanks for working on this! On Sonntag, 2. März 2014, Dave Steele wrote: > Another tack. I've removed the PackagesDB prefix commit. There is no > linkage between the logdir traceback issue and summary-json. > > summary-json (11) > > 247ac53 piuparts-report:

Bug#740386: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#740386: More robust piuparts results reporting format

2014-03-02 Thread Dave Steele
Another tack. I've removed the PackagesDB prefix commit. There is no linkage between the logdir traceback issue and summary-json. summary-json (11) 247ac53 piuparts-report: Minor rework of main loop 54d116c README_server.txt: Add reporting-section 94e8539 pkgsummary.py: Initial checkin for pkg su

Bug#740386: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#740386: More robust piuparts results reporting format

2014-03-01 Thread Dave Steele
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On 2014-03-01 16:44, Dave Steele wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >>> On 2014-02-28 22:57, Dave Steele wrote: 3057fb6 piuparts-report.py: Establish PackagesDB prefix >>> >>> NACK. Or why is this needed

Bug#740386: More robust piuparts results reporting format

2014-03-01 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2014-03-01 16:44, Dave Steele wrote: > On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >> On 2014-02-28 22:57, Dave Steele wrote: >>> 3057fb6 piuparts-report.py: Establish PackagesDB prefix >> >> NACK. Or why is this needed for sources_db? This doesn't have logfiles. >> > > Because Pac

Bug#740386: More robust piuparts results reporting format

2014-03-01 Thread Dave Steele
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On 2014-02-28 22:57, Dave Steele wrote: >> 3057fb6 piuparts-report.py: Establish PackagesDB prefix > > NACK. Or why is this needed for sources_db? This doesn't have logfiles. > Because PackagesDB always cares about log files. $ pwd /home/

Bug#740386: More robust piuparts results reporting format

2014-02-28 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2014-02-28 22:57, Dave Steele wrote: > 3057fb6 piuparts-report.py: Establish PackagesDB prefix NACK. Or why is this needed for sources_db? This doesn't have logfiles. Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con

Bug#740386: More robust piuparts results reporting format

2014-02-28 Thread Dave Steele
Package: piuparts-master Version: 0.57 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: debian...@lists.debian.org thanks Create a new JSON summary on the piuparts-master web site for exporting richer information about piuparts test results. The content is targeted for piuparts integration into DDPO. summary