On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 07:05:29PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Best would be if spamassassin itself was able to understand that this
> directory is not fully populated yet and ignore it until it is so that
> it could avoid the "no rules" error itself. If there is a bug to be
> pointed at I think th
Il Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 09:39:09AM +0100, To Noah Meyerhans scrisse:
> Il Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 07:48:29PM -0500, Noah Meyerhans scrisse:
> [cut]
> > If you delete /var/lib/spamassassin/3.004000, you should be able to
> > update to 3.4.0. Can you confirm this? If that works, then I'd be
>
> I confi
Il Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 07:48:29PM -0500, Noah Meyerhans scrisse:
[cut]
> If you delete /var/lib/spamassassin/3.004000, you should be able to
> update to 3.4.0. Can you confirm this? If that works, then I'd be
I confirm.
> interested in seeing if things stay stable following a manual run of
> sa-
Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> If bug 739373 was triggered on the first sa-update run, then
> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.004000 would have been created but never
> populated with rules. This could leave spamassassin in a situation
> similar to the one you're in. It would have to affect the very first run
> o
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 09:46:13AM +0100, Stefano Callegari wrote:
> Feb 21 09:12:22.731 [22110] dbg: config: using
> "/var/lib/spamassassin/3.004000" for sys rules pre files
> Feb 21 09:12:22.731 [22110] dbg: config: using
> "/var/lib/spamassassin/3.004000" for default rules dir
> Feb 21 09:12:22.
Il gio, feb 20, 2014 at 10:18:47 +0100, To Noah Meyerhans scrisse:
[cut]
> and no more errors!
>
> /var/cache/apt/archives <-su> # /etc/init.d/amavis status
> [ ok ] amavisd is running.
>
> gio feb 20 09:51:32 @hpdv5:
> /var/cache/apt/archives <-su> # /etc/init.d/spamassassin status
> [ ok ] spa
Il Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 12:36:38AM -0500, Noah Meyerhans scrisse:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:32:15AM +0100, Stefano wrote:
> > Feb 19 09:27:30 hpdv5 spamd[29307]: logger: removing stderr method
> > Feb 19 09:27:30 hpdv5 spamd[29310]: config: no rules were found! Do you
> > need to run 'sa-update'
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:32:15AM +0100, Stefano wrote:
> Feb 19 09:27:30 hpdv5 spamd[29307]: logger: removing stderr method
> Feb 19 09:27:30 hpdv5 spamd[29310]: config: no rules were found! Do you
> need to run 'sa-update'?
That's odd, since of course there are rules included in the package.
Ha
Package: spamassassin
Version: 3.4.0-1
Severity: important
Tags: d-i
Dear Maintainer,
during last update, aptitude exit with
Failed to perform requested operation on package. Trying to recover:
Configurazione di spamassassin (3.4.0-1)...
Starting SpamAssassin Mail Filter Daemon: child process [
9 matches
Mail list logo
