On 2014-03-01 06:06, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> [...]
>
> This is now fixed, it should be safe to remove ruby1.8 now.
>
> 8<8<8<-
> [...]
> $ dak rm -s testing -Rn ruby1.8
> [...]
>
> Checking reverse dependencies...
> # Broken Depen
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 07:56:57PM -0500, James McCoy wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 08:29:35PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Removing subversion doesn't seem reasonable. The sid version might be
> > fixed (I haven't checked), but it FTBFS. So that'll need to be taken
> > care of first.
>
>
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 08:29:35PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Removing subversion doesn't seem reasonable. The sid version might be
> fixed (I haven't checked), but it FTBFS. So that'll need to be taken
> care of first.
One of the FTBFS appears to be a transient issue. A gb would likely fix
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:04:38 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Dear release team,
>
> The Ruby team is working to be able to not ship ruby1.8 with Jessie for
> quite a whil
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear release team,
The Ruby team is working to be able to not ship ruby1.8 with Jessie for
quite a while. This is being tracked since DebConf13 at
https://release.debian.org/transition
5 matches
Mail list logo