Bug#738199: Progress

2016-07-04 Thread Sébastien Delafond
A quick note to report progress on this issue. I'm having a hard time working with CVS after such a long time, so I've setup a git repository for the oval generator: https://github.com/sdelafond/debian-oval I started with Nicholas' parseJSON2Oval.py, and am making progress toward aggregating in

Bug#738199:

2016-06-16 Thread Marcus Furlong
It would be great to get this feature working again. Is there anything in particular holding it up? Do the patchsets still apply cleanly? -- Marcus Furlong

Bug#738199: 738199 - Working Solution

2015-11-27 Thread Sébastien Delafond
Hi Nicholas, sorry for the long delay in getting back to you on this topic. I finally set aside the time to go through your work, and it's quite impressive. I'll need to do a bit more testing, but we should be able to integrate your contribution into the security repository, and use that to provid

Bug#738199: 738199 - Working Solution

2015-11-13 Thread Luedtke, Nicholas S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Attached is a working solution to this bug. Right now parsing the JSON Security Tracker Information results in a one definition per CVE. I hope to reduce this to one definition per package. (Shouldn't be too much work) Also included in the tar is are m

Bug#738199: 738199

2015-11-06 Thread Luedtke, Nicholas S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Looking at the JSON file we may just be able to get all the data from there and generate a set of definitions just based off the security tracker. Either way now that the split is over with I have some extra time to start working on this again. - --

Bug#738199: 738199

2015-10-05 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 09:02:43PM +, Luedtke, Nicholas S wrote: > Going forward is it safe to assume that > "fixing versions" are arch independent? Yes, these are per source package. Cheers, Moritz

Bug#738199: 738199

2015-10-05 Thread Luedtke, Nicholas S
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 23:20:54 +0200 =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A9bastien?= Delafond wrote: > The URL is https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/data/json (listed > from https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker), and using any script > language against this JSON data it's quite trivial to get the versio

Bug#738199: 738199

2015-09-29 Thread Sébastien Delafond
The clean solution these days seems to be about querying the tracker via the JSON entrypoint. It exposes that info, and avoids relying directly on {CVE,DSA}/list. Modifying the DSA format itself is a bit involved, and could have potentially far reaching consequences. After researching information

Bug#738199: 738199

2015-09-29 Thread Luedtke, Nicholas S
Finally, got a chance to look at this and confirm what the others have been saying. The simplest way would be to add an affected version line to the DSA. But that may complicate other systems. That being said, I could just parse from the security tracker unless there is another list somewhere that

Bug#738199: 738199

2015-08-10 Thread Sébastien Delafond
On Aug/04, Nicholas Luedtke wrote: > Is this still an ongoing issue? > > As I am looking at bringing the MITRE Oval Interpreter (ovaldi) up to speed > for Debian (by modifying and packaging) I am noticing that there have been > no OVAL Definitions from Debian for quite some time. I can put forth s

Bug#738199: 738199

2015-08-04 Thread Nicholas Luedtke
Is this still an ongoing issue? As I am looking at bringing the MITRE Oval Interpreter (ovaldi) up to speed for Debian (by modifying and packaging) I am noticing that there have been no OVAL Definitions from Debian for quite some time. I can put forth some time in to looking at this, if it is

Bug#738199: 738199

2015-01-07 Thread Sébastien Delafond
Per https://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2011/10/msg00064.html, the proper way is apparently to parse DSA/list. I've only had a cursory look so far, so I'm not sure yet how much effort that requires. Cheers, --Seb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subj

Bug#738199: Fixing OVAL generation

2015-01-07 Thread MONLONG Pierre
I can give some help. I try to understand the scripts. One problem I noticed is that since the update of the DSA format (DSA-2134), we loose the part where the corrected packages are listed : --extract-- Fixed in: Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 (lenny) Source: http://security

Bug#738199: Fixing OVAL generation

2015-01-07 Thread Sébastien Delafond
I will give it a try later this week, when I have some spare time. Cheers, --Seb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#738199: Access to the oval generation script ?

2014-03-11 Thread Raphael Geissert
Hi, On Tuesday 11 March 2014 17:06:33 Pierre Chifflier wrote: > It seems the script to generate OVAL definitions is broken. As the > maintainer of openscap, I would like to give a try to update the script > and make the definitions work again. > Is it possible to access the script ? If so, where ?

Bug#738199: Access to the oval generation script ?

2014-03-11 Thread Pierre Chifflier
Hi, It seems the script to generate OVAL definitions is broken. As the maintainer of openscap, I would like to give a try to update the script and make the definitions work again. Is it possible to access the script ? If so, where ? Thanks, Pierre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-r

Bug#738199: on /security/oval

2014-02-10 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 07:27:06PM +0100, Luciano Bello wrote: > I think your contribution is necessary. Would you like to comment something > out > here? :) As Raphael said, the OVAL script generation code is broken but can be fixed. I just either need spare time to be able to work on this and/

Bug#738199: on /security/oval

2014-02-10 Thread Luciano Bello
Hi Javier, Long time without contact you :) I filed bugs.debian.org/738199 some hours ago and raphael mentioned that the project is not abandoned, but "just-broken". luciano: well, oval itself hasn't been abandoned. It's mainly that the script that generates the oval definitions for

Bug#738199: the section oval should be removed

2014-02-08 Thread Luciano Bello
Package: security.debian.org Severity: wishlist The page https://www.debian.org/security/oval/ contains information about Open Vulnerability and Assessment Language (OVAL) [1] which is abandoned. Please remove this section. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianOval /luciano -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,