Bug#735565: RFS: couriergrey/0.3.2-5

2014-01-16 Thread Marco Balmer
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 04:03:49PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > In that case no need for you to re-upload; I can just remove the > .orig.tar.bz2 locally and rebuild the source package from the same > working tree against the existing .orig.tar.gz. Is that OK with you? That's absolutly o.k. for me

Bug#735565: RFS: couriergrey/0.3.2-5

2014-01-16 Thread Marco Balmer
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 03:48:41PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > The package on mentors.d.n has an .orig.tar.bz2, but the version > currently in the Debian archive has an .orig.tar.gz. Was this change > intentional? (I noticed because dpkg-buildpackage complains about both > of them being present

Bug#735565: RFS: couriergrey/0.3.2-5

2014-01-16 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 04:52:40PM +0100, Marco Balmer wrote: > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 03:48:41PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > > The package on mentors.d.n has an .orig.tar.bz2, but the version > > currently in the Debian archive has an .orig.tar.gz. Was this change > > intentional? (I noticed b

Bug#735565: RFS: couriergrey/0.3.2-5

2014-01-16 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 03:45:45PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 04:30:52PM +0100, Marco Balmer wrote: > > For your information: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=735565 > > Sorry for the delay. I'm building it now. I think it's fine to upload > the watc

Bug#735565: RFS: couriergrey/0.3.2-5

2014-01-16 Thread Marco Balmer
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "couriergrey" * Package name: couriergrey Version : 0.3.2-5 Upstream Author : Matthias Wimmer * URL : http://couriergrey.com/ * License : GPL-2+