-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01/25/2014 05:24 AM, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quoting The Wanderer (2014-01-22 15:14:34)
>
>> Do things still work fine in Debian when using ld.gold (by
>> installing the binutils-gold package) rather than ld.bfd? I know
>> there's an
Hi Ahmed,
Quoting أحمد المحمودي (2014-01-22 08:52:43)
> At the end of the README it says to use mountlo, but there isn't such a
> utility in Debian.
there is also no such utility in other distributions it seems. After some
digging I found out that mountlo is a utility which uses fuse and a minima
Hi,
Quoting The Wanderer (2014-01-22 15:14:34)
> Do things still work fine in Debian when using ld.gold (by installing the
> binutils-gold package) rather than ld.bfd? I know there's an important
> difference in ld.gold related to --as-needed (or possibly to -
> --no-as-needed, I don't recall offh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01/22/2014 05:12 AM, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quoting أحمد المحمودي (2014-01-22 10:36:11)
>
>> Actually what happens implicitly (at least on Ubuntu precise) is:
>> $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $^ -o $@
>>
>> which causes the compilation
Hi,
Quoting أحمد المحمودي (2014-01-22 10:36:11)
> Actually what happens implicitly (at least on Ubuntu precise) is: $(CC)
> $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $^ -o $@
>
> which causes the compilation to fail, because the -l<...> should be
> after the object files (or source files in this case).
Ah f
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:22:12AM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Hi Ahmed,
>
> Quoting أحمد المحمودي (2014-01-22 08:51:02)
> > Sorry, that I forgot to attach it. Please find it attached in this email.
>
> thanks! What problem does that patch fix?
>
> The only differences in comparison to my
Hi Ahmed,
Quoting أحمد المحمودي (2014-01-22 08:51:02)
> Sorry, that I forgot to attach it. Please find it attached in this email.
thanks! What problem does that patch fix?
The only differences in comparison to my patch that I can make out are:
1) you add -lpthread but `pkg-config --libs fuse
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 07:39:05AM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> It is clear for me. Maybe if you tell me how it is not clear for you I can fix
> it accordingly. I especially like how the README even includes steps to use
> fdisk to figure out the partition offsets.
---end quoted text---
At t
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 07:39:05AM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Hi Ahmed,
>
> Quoting أحمد المحمودي (2014-01-22 06:51:13)
> > * I had to modify the hardening patch to get fuseloop to build, modified
> > patch is attached.
>
> I think you forgot to attach your patch but notice that after i
Hi Ahmed,
Quoting أحمد المحمودي (2014-01-22 06:51:13)
> * I had to modify the hardening patch to get fuseloop to build, modified
> patch is attached.
I think you forgot to attach your patch but notice that after informing
upstream of the issue, they fixed it for fuseloop 1.0.2 which is packag
Hello,
* I had to modify the hardening patch to get fuseloop to build, modified
patch is attached.
* I think it would be useful to install upstream's README.md (just add
it in debian/fuseloop.docs)
* The README isn't clear about how to actually mount the exposed
partition
--
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fuseloop"
* Package name: fuseloop
Version : 1.0.1-1
Upstream Author : Johny Mattsson
* URL : https://github.com/jmattsson/fuseloop
* License : BSD
Sect
12 matches
Mail list logo
