Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sun, 2014-01-12 at 17:51 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-01-12 at 18:00 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > If there are no objections, I will upload 5.1.1~deb7u1 to
> > proposed-updates.
>
> Ack, looks okay to me.
Flagged for acceptance; thanks.
Regards,
On Sun, 2014-01-12 at 18:00 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> If there are no objections, I will upload 5.1.1~deb7u1 to
> proposed-updates.
Ack, looks okay to me.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
If there are no objections, I will upload 5.1.1~deb7u1 to
proposed-updates.
FYI, I have no plan to systematically feed back to stable the database
entries for the new gTLDs, since they will not be active for many months
at least.
--
ciao,
Marco
diff -Nru whois-5.1.0/config.h whois-5.1.1/confi
[Re-sending with a gzipped attachment, as the BTS's spam-checking ate
the original]
Control: tags -1 + wheezy confirmed
On Fri, 2013-12-27 at 23:15 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> whois in stable should be updated due to the many changes in the
> database.
> I think that the smartest choice would b
On Dec 28, "Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
> This change isn't explicitly documented afaics. Have servers stopped
> supporting the "S" flag, or was it not actually supported to begin with?
I have forgot the exact details of what it meant, but it was not
commonly used and it is not supported anymore by
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
whois in stable should be updated due to the many changes in the
database.
I think that the smartest choice would be to reupload the latest
release, once it will have transitioned to testing.
A
6 matches
Mail list logo
