Control: tags 731343 + pending
Control: tags 731351 + pending
On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 11:44 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 04 décembre 2013 à 20:04 +, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> > > On the other hand, you might want to see a Breaks: libgtk-3-0 << 3.4.2-7
> > > in the updated libr
Le mercredi 04 décembre 2013 à 20:04 +, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> > On the other hand, you might want to see a Breaks: libgtk-3-0 << 3.4.2-7
> > in the updated librsvg – I have forgotten it so far.
>
> That would be good; thanks.
>
> Assuming that the resulting packages have been tested in
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 20:52 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 04 décembre 2013 à 19:50 +, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> > On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 14:13 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > I’d like to upload an update (prepared by Raphaël) for gtk+3
Le mercredi 04 décembre 2013 à 19:50 +, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> Control: tags -1 + wheezy moreinfo
>
> On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 14:13 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > I’d like to upload an update (prepared by Raphaël) for gtk+3.0, which is
> > necessary in order to fix librsvg’s CVE-2013-1
Control: tags -1 + wheezy moreinfo
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 14:13 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> I’d like to upload an update (prepared by Raphaël) for gtk+3.0, which is
> necessary in order to fix librsvg’s CVE-2013-1881.
Does this work correctly in conjunction with a librsvg which does not
incl
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
I’d like to upload an update (prepared by Raphaël) for gtk+3.0, which is
necessary in order to fix librsvg’s CVE-2013-1881.
Thanks for considering.
--
Josselin Mouette
Index: debian/chang
6 matches
Mail list logo
