On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 12:21:02AM -0500, James McCoy wrote:
> I didn't touch daklib/changes.py's add_known_changes since it seemed
> like the original data should be preserved in the db. That may mean
> other tools need to perform checks similar to what is being done in my
> patch, though.
>
> I
On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 08:52:19PM -0500, James McCoy wrote:
> Please consider the attached patch.
Updated patch which also changes dak/process_policy.py.
I didn't touch daklib/changes.py's add_known_changes since it seemed
like the original data should be preserved in the db. That may mean
othe
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: dak
Tags: patch
Please consider the attached patch.
Cheers,
--
James
GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy
From 482723d951ca6e877474d2c08ec777dc7b6c9cea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: James McCo
3 matches
Mail list logo