On Fr, 15 Nov 2013, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-korean/2013/06/msg1.html
I cannot read that, but I guess they will be happy with having
the newest kotex from the maintainers in Debian via TeX Live.
THanks for researching in this direction!
Norbert
-
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 05:46:53PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Fr, 15 Nov 2013, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > Of course, removing the debian package from debian. I do not understand
> > why you mention upstream here, I never said a word about upstream.
>
> ...
>
> On Do, 14 Nov 2013, Ralf Trein
On Fr, 15 Nov 2013, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> Of course, removing the debian package from debian. I do not understand
> why you mention upstream here, I never said a word about upstream.
...
On Do, 14 Nov 2013, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> Maybe that package should be removed completely ? Did you try to
>
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 05:00:51PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Do, 14 Nov 2013, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > Maybe to avoid that a user unknowingly makes the wrong choice and installs
> > the outdated ko.tex package instead of the more up-to-date package from
> > texlive?
>
> What can upstream
On Do, 14 Nov 2013, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> Maybe to avoid that a user unknowingly makes the wrong choice and installs
> the outdated ko.tex package instead of the more up-to-date package from
> texlive?
What can upstream do here? I should ask the *maintainer* of ko.tex in
Debian to request removal
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 01:35:23AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Do, 14 Nov 2013, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > Maybe that package should be removed completely ? Did you try to
> > contact the upstream author ?
>
> For what? Upstream has finally included kotex in TeX Live by uploading
> it to CTA
On Do, 14 Nov 2013, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> Maybe that package should be removed completely ? Did you try to
> contact the upstream author ?
For what? Upstream has finally included kotex in TeX Live by uploading
it to CTAN. So the same upstream is used, only with a difference of a few years
;-)
N
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 07:21:44PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi Ralf,
>
> On Do, 14 Nov 2013, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > or better, rename the files that occur in both packages. These are:
>
> Why? ko.tex in Debian is horribly outdated (2007).
> texlive-lang-cjk contains an uptodate version.
Hi Ralf,
On Do, 14 Nov 2013, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> or better, rename the files that occur in both packages. These are:
Why? ko.tex in Debian is horribly outdated (2007).
texlive-lang-cjk contains an uptodate version.
I don't see any need to *not* conflict with ko.tex*
Do you see any?
Norbert
PS
Norbert Preining :
> new texlive-lang-cjk file conflicts with ko.tex-bin
or better, rename the files that occur in both packages. These are:
/usr/bin/komkindex
/usr/bin/ttf2kotexfont
-Ralf.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscri
Package: texlive-lang-cjk
Version: 2013.20131112-1
Severity: serious
Justification: file conflicts
new texlive-lang-cjk file conflicts with ko.tex-bin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.
11 matches
Mail list logo