Stefano Zacchiroli writes:
> This seems, in fact, to be a bug in how the "end game" functionality is
> implemented. Here is what happens, according to the console log, when
> using the "end game" button in the UI:
> (Game over) new match 3
> (zack) end game
> play
> (gnubg) (Game over) n
Hi Stefano,
Sorry about the long, long delay in getting back to this.
Stefano Zacchiroli writes:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 08:08:41PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I think I may be missing something here, but what semantics do you
>> believe ending the current game in the middle of a match shou
Hey Russ,
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 08:08:41PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I think I may be missing something here, but what semantics do you believe
> ending the current game in the middle of a match should have? Off-hand,
> that doesn't seem like a sensible action to me, since wouldn't it then
>
Stefano Zacchiroli writes:
> When playing a multi-game match, there seems to be no way of asking GNU
> Backgammon to only end the *current* game (which is particularly handy
> when one is, say, exercising middle-game and is not interested in
> playing bear-off phases).
> This seems, in fact, to
Package: gnubg
Version: 1.02.000-2
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
When playing a multi-game match, there seems to be no way of asking GNU
Backgammon to only end the *current* game (which is particularly handy when one
is, say, exercising middle-game and is not interested in playing bear-off
phase
5 matches
Mail list logo
