On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 19:50:54 +
Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> The sysvinit page doesn't have a specific maintainer/advocate. It is a
> collection of opinions from discussion on debian-devel@ and elsewhere.
> Other camps have already responded to parts they don't agree with.
>
> Unless any volu
The sysvinit page doesn't have a specific maintainer/advocate. It is a
collection of opinions from discussion on debian-devel@ and elsewhere.
Other camps have already responded to parts they don't agree with.
Unless any volunteers want to make last-minute small changes, it can
probably be taken a
On 11/22/2013 04:56 AM, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/11/13 18:23, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> What is the current status of the other position statements from the
>> perspective of their maintainers? Do people have a feel for when they'll
>> consider their positions finalized, at least pe
Hi,
On 10/11/13 18:23, Russ Allbery wrote:
> What is the current status of the other position statements from the
> perspective of their maintainers? Do people have a feel for when they'll
> consider their positions finalized, at least pending Technical Committee
> feedback and questions?
Sorry
Hi Russ,
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 10:23:06AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Ian Jackson writes:
> > Ian Jackson writes:
> >> So I would appreciate it if you (and by "you" I mean each side of the
> >> argument) would make sure that your page represents the best case you
> >> can put forward.
> > Th
Ian Jackson writes:
> Ian Jackson writes:
>> So I would appreciate it if you (and by "you" I mean each side of the
>> argument) would make sure that your page represents the best case you
>> can put forward.
> This seems to have come along very well in the past few days.
> We now have five camp
Hi Ian,
Le jeudi 31 octobre 2013 à 15:01 +, Ian Jackson a écrit :
> Perhaps it would be good if the camp leader(s) for each camp would
> reply with a summary of:
> - the status of their own main arguments: are you mostly done,
> or do you expect to add more substantial points
> - the
Konstantinos Margaritis writes ("Bug#727708: init system question before the
technical committee"):
> So I think this question should really be added as a con to systemd.
The way that the Debate wiki system works is that the proponents of
any particular answer are in charge of the
Hi all,
I'd just like to mentioned just a small(big? you decide) issue that I
haven't seen mentioned yet from anyone. Against systemd.
systemd has explicitly mentioned its Linux-only support. Sure, that
affects kFreeBSD/Hurd now. But changing an init system should be done
looking ahead *at least
Ian Jackson writes:
> How long do people think finalising this is going to take ? There are
> some potential problems with setting a hard deadline in advance but
> we're hoping to deal with this matter fairly soon now.
I propose the following approach:
1. Set a date for the first drafts of the
Ian Jackson writes ("Bug#727708: init system question before the technical
committee"):
> Steve Langasek writes[1]:
> > https://wiki.debian.org/Debate/initsystem/systemd
...
> So I would appreciate it if you (and by "you" I mean each side of the
> argum
Steve Langasek writes[1]:
> For my part, I think the suggestion that Russ and Lars made a while ago to
> maintain position statements in the Debian wiki is a good one, and I would
> encourage you to make use of this structure so that you can lay out your
> arguments in a way that doesn't require yo
12 matches
Mail list logo
