7...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#727708: Call for Votes on init system coupling
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 12:26:31 -0800
Thorsten Glaser writes:
> Russ Allbery dixit:
>> But when providing project-wide guidance, we have an obligation to
>> worry about the error conditions as well. If
Thorsten Glaser writes:
> Russ Allbery dixit:
>> But when providing project-wide guidance, we have an obligation to
>> worry about the error conditions as well. If multiple logind
>> implementations do *not* materialize, or if they do materialize but
>> then people lose interest
> I question wh
Russ Allbery dixit:
>But when providing project-wide guidance, we have an obligation to worry
>about the error conditions as well. If multiple logind implementations do
>*not* materialize, or if they do materialize but then people lose interest
I question why logind is needed in the first place.
Colin Watson writes:
> I ran across this interesting post from an upstream GNOME developer
> which I think deserves some signal-boosting ...
Indeed. Thanks for the pointer.
Bdale
pgpk4fxk2Sw2f.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I have reposted an improved version of this reply to debian-project and
debian-vote, in response to the proposed GR, since I think the TC work has
concluded and that's now the appropriate forum for the conversation. We
can keep talking about it here if that seems like a good idea for some
reason t
Colin Watson writes:
> I ran across this interesting post from an upstream GNOME developer
> which I think deserves some signal-boosting, as I haven't seen much of
> its contents mentioned or alluded to so far in this thread, and it's
> quite relevant to how much we should expect this to be a pro
I ran across this interesting post from an upstream GNOME developer
which I think deserves some signal-boosting, as I haven't seen much of
its contents mentioned or alluded to so far in this thread, and it's
quite relevant to how much we should expect this to be a problem:
http://blogs.gnome.org
Ian Jackson writes:
> I hereby call for votes on my coupling proposal and the amendments
> that have been put.
With all 8 votes cast, this CFV on the init system coupling issue has
ended in a tie between options "L" and "N". Given my vote on this
issue, it should be no surprise that I use my ca
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 06:04:07PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I hereby call for votes on my coupling proposal and the amendments
> that have been put.
> The options on the ballot are:
> L Software may not depend on a specific init system
> N No TC resolution on this question at this time
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:58:25AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Feb 2014, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Ian Jackson (ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk) [140221 19:06]:
> > > The options on the ballot are:
> > >
> > > L Software may not depend on a specific init system
> > > N No TC
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Ian Jackson (ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk) [140221 19:06]:
> > The options on the ballot are:
> >
> > L Software may not depend on a specific init system
> > N No TC resolution on this question at this time
> > A Advice: sysvinit compati
* Ian Jackson (ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk) [140221 19:06]:
> The options on the ballot are:
>
> L Software may not depend on a specific init system
> N No TC resolution on this question at this time
> A Advice: sysvinit compatibility in jessie and multiple init support
> FD Fur
Ian Jackson writes:
> I hereby call for votes on my coupling proposal and the amendments
> that have been put.
>
> The options on the ballot are:
>
> L Software may not depend on a specific init system
> N No TC resolution on this question at this time
> A Advice: sysvinit compatibili
Ian Jackson writes:
> I hereby call for votes on my coupling proposal and the amendments
> that have been put.
>
> L Software may not depend on a specific init system
> N No TC resolution on this question at this time
> A Advice: sysvinit compatibility in jessie and multiple init supp
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 06:04:07PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> L Software may not depend on a specific init system
> N No TC resolution on this question at this time
> A Advice: sysvinit compatibility in jessie and multiple init support
> FD Further discussion
I vote L N A FD.
--
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I hereby call for votes on my coupling proposal and the amendments
> that have been put.
>
> The options on the ballot are:
>
> L Software may not depend on a specific init system
> N No TC resolution on this question at this time
> A Advice:
Ian Jackson writes:
> I hereby call for votes on my coupling proposal and the amendments
> that have been put.
> The options on the ballot are:
> L Software may not depend on a specific init system
> N No TC resolution on this question at this time
> A Advice: sysvinit compatibility
Ian Jackson writes ("Bug#727708: Call for Votes on init system coupling"):
> I hereby call for votes on my coupling proposal and the amendments
> that have been put.
>
> The options on the ballot are:
>
> L Software may not depend on a specific init system
>
I hereby call for votes on my coupling proposal and the amendments
that have been put.
The options on the ballot are:
L Software may not depend on a specific init system
N No TC resolution on this question at this time
A Advice: sysvinit compatibility in jessie and multiple init suppo
19 matches
Mail list logo
