hi gianfranco,
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 09:57:50AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Ok I found and fixed the problem.
>
> The problem was that (seems to be a fault in debian/check build), check
> wasn't linked against pthread, math and time.
> this commit fixed the problem
> https://github.c
> Il Martedì 29 Ottobre 2013 10:23, Robert Lemmen ha
> scritto:
> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 08:50:05AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>> >because of this, libcheck is shipped as a *static only* library, which
>> >means you can still link against it and don't have to include
> libcheck
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 08:50:05AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> >because of this, libcheck is shipped as a *static only* library, which
> >means you can still link against it and don't have to include libcheck
> >*code* in your project. the static library is called liobcheck.a, and a
> >ty
Il Lunedì 28 Ottobre 2013 14:16, Robert Lemmen ha
scritto:
hi gianfranco,
>
>there is indeed some reasoning behind this: the ABI (and even API) of
>libcheck isn't particularily stable, arguably it wouldn't even be
>desirable for a library like this to have a stable interface: the cost
>of maki
hi gianfranco,
there is indeed some reasoning behind this: the ABI (and even API) of
libcheck isn't particularily stable, arguably it wouldn't even be
desirable for a library like this to have a stable interface: the cost
of making it harder to change outweghts the benefits.
because of this, li
Control: retitle -1 check framework library is missing the so files
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: check
Version: 0.9.10-5
Hi developers, maybe do you have a rationale for this, but in ettercap we have
recently enabled tests, and we link our tests with libcheck.so file.
In debian seems to be this file is deleted upon build, as shown in rules file
rm -f debian/check/usr/lib/$(
7 matches
Mail list logo
