On Fri, 18 Oct 2013, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2013, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > I'm still not sure why the virus contained in the source could not be
> > replaced by the EICAR test signature.
>
> Because it’s not testing a virus scanner, but because the
> specific RFC822 message in q
Jarkko Palviainen f-secure.com> writes:
> I looked into one of these, libmail-deliverystatus-bounceparser-
> perl_1.531.orig.tar.gz, and found multipart email file containing zip
> attachment. Inside this archive is a .pif file (PE32 executable for MS
Windows)
> which is detected as Win32.Worm.My
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> I'm still not sure why the virus contained in the source could not be
> replaced by the EICAR test signature.
Because it’s not testing a virus scanner, but because the
specific RFC822 message in question exhibited multiple problems
in the code, due to
* Dominik George:
> It isn't a false positive in that regard that the package *does* in fact
> contain the virus sample.
That's non-free code and not suitable for main, so it must be removed
from the source tarball anyway.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
w
Scott Kitterman wrote:
>Boots fine if the image is not persistent.
Sorry. Wrong bug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Boots fine if the image is not persistent.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 2013-10-15 11:54, Dominik George wrote:
[Jarkko Palviainen; attribution lost in quoted mail]
http://ftp.fi.debian.org/[...]
If you suspect an issue with the Debian archive, please test against
ftp.debian.org.
That's not particularly great advice. ftp.debian.org is just another
mirror[tm];
On 10/15/2013 03:09 PM, Dominique Dumont wrote:
On Tuesday 15 October 2013 13:19:38 Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
It isn't a false positive in that regard that the package *does* in fact
contain the virus sample. However, it *is* a false positive, as the
sample is there intentionally, and no virus scan
On Tue, October 15, 2013 14:09, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> In libmail-deliverystatus-bounceparser-perl case, the virus is used on the
> non-regressions test which are shipped in the original tarball (and in
> Debian *source* package). This virus is *not* shipped in Debian binary
> package.
I'm stil
On Tuesday 15 October 2013 13:19:38 Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > It isn't a false positive in that regard that the package *does* in fact
> > contain the virus sample. However, it *is* a false positive, as the
> > sample is there intentionally, and no virus scanner can guess the reason
> > why it is
On Tue, October 15, 2013 12:54, Dominik George wrote:
>> I looked into one of these, libmail-deliverystatus-bounceparser-
>> perl_1.531.orig.tar.gz, and found multipart email file containing zip
>> attachment. Inside this archive is a .pif file (PE32 executable for MS
>> Windows)
>> which is detect
Pymilter is a false positive.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I have looked into this a bit.
> Some of the source packages were caught on a gateway anti-virus scanner while
> downloading.
Using a gateway anti-virus scanner for downloads from the Debian archive
seems a bit inappropriate, well, paranoid. Checking the signed hashsums
would seem a lot bett
Package: general
Severity: normal
Some of the source packages were caught on a gateway anti-virus scanner while
downloading.
These are the exact downloads:
http://ftp.fi.debian.org/debian/pool/main/libm/libmime-explode-perl/libmime-
explode-perl_0.39.orig.tar.gz
http://ftp.fi.debian.org/debian/p
14 matches
Mail list logo
