On Tue, 2014-09-23 at 11:42 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 10:02:18 +0100, "Adam D. Barratt"
> wrote:
> > On 2014-09-23 9:43, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > > And I still managed to mess this up :-(. The following patch fixes
> > > #762547
> > > which was just filed against stable:
> >
On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 10:02:18 +0100, "Adam D. Barratt"
wrote:
> On 2014-09-23 9:43, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > And I still managed to mess this up :-(. The following patch fixes
> > #762547
> > which was just filed against stable:
> [...]
> > Is it OK if I upload this?
>
> Please go ahead.
Done, th
On 2014-09-23 9:43, Stephen Kitt wrote:
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 23:53:32 +0200, Stephen Kitt
wrote:
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 22:49:52 +0100, "Adam D. Barratt"
wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-09-20 at 19:08 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Apologies for the long delay in getting back to you.
> >
> > On Wed, 2013
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 23:53:32 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 22:49:52 +0100, "Adam D. Barratt"
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2014-09-20 at 19:08 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > Apologies for the long delay in getting back to you.
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 22:59 +0200, Stephen
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sat, 2014-09-20 at 19:08 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> Apologies for the long delay in getting back to you.
>
> On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 22:59 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > On Wed, 02 Oct 2013 20:29:00 +0100, "Adam D. Barratt"
> > w
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 22:49:52 +0100, "Adam D. Barratt"
wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-09-20 at 19:08 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Apologies for the long delay in getting back to you.
> >
> > On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 22:59 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > > On Wed, 02 Oct 2013 20:29:00 +0100, "Adam D. Barra
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
Apologies for the long delay in getting back to you.
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 22:59 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Oct 2013 20:29:00 +0100, "Adam D. Barratt"
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 07:52 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > > oss-compat in stable suffers
On Wed, 02 Oct 2013 20:29:00 +0100, "Adam D. Barratt"
wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 07:52 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > oss-compat in stable suffers from two serious bugs:
> > * 660803, related to changes in kmod (and causing issues when
> > installing Debian Edu wheezy);
> > * 718241, w
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 07:52 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> oss-compat in stable suffers from two serious bugs:
> * 660803, related to changes in kmod (and causing issues when
> installing Debian Edu wheezy);
> * 718241, which was initially just a tracking bug for testing but
> also applie
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
oss-compat in stable suffers from two serious bugs:
* 660803, related to changes in kmod (and causing issues when
installing Debian Edu wheezy);
* 718241, which was initially just a
10 matches
Mail list logo