clone 724469 -1
retitle -1 libglib-object-introspection-perl: FTBFS on 64-bit big-endian
architectures
severity -1 important
found -1 0.020-2
close 724469 0.020-2
thanks
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 01:00:19PM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> intrigeri wrote (26 Mar 2014 11:25:38 GMT) :
> > 2. I want Jessie
Hi,
Adam Conrad wrote (23 Mar 2014 20:03:12 GMT) :
> Not fixing a bug isn't the way to get rid of it.
I agree. My wording was not appropriate, and I'm sorry for the bad
feelings I may have caused.
Hoping to clarify a bit:
1. I'll try to go on playing the intermediate between the relevant
p
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 10:33:32AM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
>
> I'd rather not drop s390x from the list of architectures this package
> is built for, but this RC bug has now been around for 6 months, and at
> some point I'll want to get rid of it.
Not fixing a bug isn't the way to get rid of it.
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:53:23AM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
>> intrigeri wrote (20 Jan 2014 17:58:03 GMT) :
https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=89552
>>> Sure. Debian porters, I'll let you subscribe to the RT ticket, and
>>> hopefully take care of this porting p
Hi,
Bastian Blank wrote (23 Mar 2014 10:04:34 GMT) :
> Care to share the results of your own findings?
Unfortunately, I don't have the skills needed to work on this problem
myself, so there is no such thing to share. The best I can do is to go
on forwarding patches and test results between upstre
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 10:33:32AM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> Any s390x porter planning to work on this? (And if so, ETA?)
Care to share the results of your own findings? You know where the
problem is located and you obviously know zelenka.d.o.
Bastian
--
Power is danger.
-- The
Hi,
Lennart Sorensen wrote (22 Mar 2014 12:31:00 GMT) :
> Patch works for powerpc and someone else already reported it working
> for powerpcspe.
Adam Conrad wrote (22 Mar 2014 16:20:23 GMT) :
> Works fine for me on powerpc,
Thanks a lot for testing!
I've uploaded libglib-object-introspection-pe
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:53:23AM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
>
> AFAICT the latest patch proposed by upstream on February 9 [1] has
> been tested on mips only. My understanding is that upstream has been
> waiting for more test results since then. Can anyone please test this
> on other big-endian arc
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:53:23AM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> intrigeri wrote (20 Jan 2014 17:58:03 GMT) :
> >> https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=89552
> > Sure. Debian porters, I'll let you subscribe to the RT ticket, and
> > hopefully take care of this porting problem.
>
> I'd like to se
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (20 Jan 2014 17:58:03 GMT) :
>> https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=89552
> Sure. Debian porters, I'll let you subscribe to the RT ticket, and
> hopefully take care of this porting problem.
I'd like to see this RC bug fixed eventually, and I still hope this
can be done
Brian Manning wrote (17 Jan 2014 19:03:10 GMT) :
> Roderich Schupp updated the ticket [1] with comments about the patch
> this morning.
> Maybe the discussion about this patch and other fixes for this issue
> could be moved to the RT ticket?
[...]
> [1] https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=8
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:31 AM, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Brian Manning wrote (16 Jan 2014 16:43:09 GMT) :
>> There's already a bug in RT for this, with a patch, and a similar
>> statement about 64-bit big endian architectures;
>
> Thanks for the pointer, and sorry for not having looked at RT fi
Hi,
Brian Manning wrote (16 Jan 2014 16:43:09 GMT) :
> There's already a bug in RT for this, with a patch, and a similar
> statement about 64-bit big endian architectures;
Thanks for the pointer, and sorry for not having looked at RT first.
> I haven't checked to see if the two patches are the s
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 4:18 AM, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since 0.015, some of the Glib-Object-Introspection tests fail on all
> big-endian architectures supported by Debian.
>
> I am attaching the original bug report. More info can be found at
> http://bugs.debian.org/724469, including a patch
Hi,
since 0.015, some of the Glib-Object-Introspection tests fail on all
big-endian architectures supported by Debian.
I am attaching the original bug report. More info can be found at
http://bugs.debian.org/724469, including a patch that apparently fixes
the problem on 32-bit big endian architec
Roland Stigge wrote (09 Jan 2014 08:37:00 GMT) :
> Patch works on powerpcspe, thanks!
Thanks everyone for the report, the patch and the testing.
I'll forward this upstream soonish.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint
Patch works on powerpcspe, thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hello,
I have attached a patch resolving reported issue on mips architecture.
We believe that this fix will work also on other 32-bit big endian
architectures, but additional work will be needed for 64-bit big endian.
Could someone, please test this patch on other big endian architectures.
Best
Package: libglib-object-introspection-perl
Version: 0.015-1
Severity: important
libglib-object-introspection-perl fails to build on all big-endian
architectures with the following test failures:
# Failed test at t/00-basic-types.t line 15.
# got: '-1'
# expected: '-127'
# Failed
19 matches
Mail list logo
