Control: tags -1 - patch
[Tzafrir Cohen]
> That specific driver was never included in upstream DAHDI and right
> now does not seem to have any upstream maintainers. I'm not sure if I
> tried to apply it and it caused problems, or not.
I tried, and it fail to apply. The drivers/dahdi/zaphfc/bas
On 12/10/18 09:41, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + patch
>
> [Karsten Richter 2015-02-13]
>> Patch:
>>
>> 1. Replace the struct sk_buff with a plain void * that is only allocated
>> when needed. It’s a throw away buffer, so no need the added complexity of
>> sk_buff.
>> 2. Remove
Control: tags -1 + patch
[Karsten Richter 2015-02-13]
> Patch:
>
> 1. Replace the struct sk_buff with a plain void * that is only allocated when
> needed. It’s a throw away buffer, so no need the added complexity of sk_buff.
> 2. Remove memcpy which copies frame data from the channel buffer to t
Hi,
I also experienced this bug on my machine (bug is still present in latest
dahdi-linux code in SID), so I investigated a bit into the code.
Analysis:
I recognized that the sk_buff at first sight is needed in both cases of the if
statement,
but the memcpy to the sk_buff in the true case
4 matches
Mail list logo
