On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 01:25:41AM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
> > Apart from that: Uploaded!!! As the package will go through the NEW
> > queue, let's see what the ftp-masters say.
>
> Thanks a lot for the help and the final upload!
Thanks to you both!
> Meanwhile, I have started work on guac
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 11:02:09PM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
>
> There are some notes from Andreas and you in the changelog. I think they are
> irrelevant for the public. Can I drop them?
Drop whatever you think is irrelevant that I might have injected
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Hi Mike,
> I made some cosmetic changes under debian/changelog and re-fixed the
> year-author-syntax in debian/copyright's Copyright: fields.
OK. I skipped that as DEP-5 says that the Copyright: fields may well be an
exact copy of the copyright notice in the source files.
> Apart from that: Upl
Hi Nik,
On Do 02 Jun 2016 23:53:48 CEST, Dominik George wrote:
Hi,
Ack. Please give a short reason in debian/changelog for closing those
bugs, then: e.g.
- Using VNC as backend is discouraged nowadays and xrdpxorg (or
what's its name) supercedes that VNC backend. Thus closing bug related
Hi,
> Ack. Please give a short reason in debian/changelog for closing those
> bugs, then: e.g.
>
>- Using VNC as backend is discouraged nowadays and xrdpxorg (or
> what's its name) supercedes that VNC backend. Thus closing bug related
> to VNC as xrdp backend. (Closes: #1, #2, #3, #4...).
I
Hi Nik,
On Do 02 Jun 2016 23:02:09 CEST, Dominik George wrote:
Hi,
Ack. Please give a short reason in debian/changelog for closing those
bugs, then: e.g.
- Using VNC as backend is discouraged nowadays and xrdpxorg (or
what's its name) supercedes that VNC backend. Thus closing bug related
Hi,
> Ack. Please give a short reason in debian/changelog for closing those
> bugs, then: e.g.
>
>- Using VNC as backend is discouraged nowadays and xrdpxorg (or
> what's its name) supercedes that VNC backend. Thus closing bug related
> to VNC as xrdp backend. (Closes: #1, #2, #3, #4...).
Do
Hi,
> As a training task, please do this:
>
>o remove the above quoted placeholder white-list block
>o run debuild -uc -us -S -Zxz and let lintian provide you
> with files not mentioned anymore in debian/copyright
>o go over the debian/copyright.in and merge information from
>
Hi Nik,
On Do 02 Jun 2016 01:20:00 CEST, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Dominik,
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 12:44:18AM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
newest version is in collab-maint, issues seem to be resolved.
Please test, and, if satisfied, feel free to upload ;).
Very good. Unfortunately I can
On Do 02 Jun 2016 21:13:14 CEST, Dominik George wrote:
Hi,
Are you sure that all those bugs can be closed? Have you tested your
version regarding all those reported issues you are closing? If yes.
Then...
Personally, I like to name what I close. I.e. give a short description
how an issue was
Hi,
> Are you sure that all those bugs can be closed? Have you tested your
> version regarding all those reported issues you are closing? If yes.
> Then...
>
> Personally, I like to name what I close. I.e. give a short description
> how an issue was fixed. If I don't know how it was fixed but tha
Hi Dominik,
On Do 02 Jun 2016 01:26:30 CEST, Dominik George wrote:
Hi,
one more question:
Is the „Closes:“ line in changelog syntactically correct to close
all the bugs?
-nik
Are you sure that all those bugs can be closed? Have you tested your
version regarding all those reported iss
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 06:19:58AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Without checking: After Building you get a *.changes file.
run lintian on it to check, lintian will complain if the syntax is
wrong…
lintian $changes_file
--
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Without checking: After Building you get a *.changes file. Open this
and check whether it has a Closes: line featuring all the bugs you want
to close.
Sorry for my brewity
Andreas.
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 01:26:30AM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
> Hi,
>
> one more question:
>
> Is the „Close
Hi,
one more question:
Is the „Closes:“ line in changelog syntactically correct to close all the bugs?
-nik
--
PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17 FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296
Dominik George · Mobil: +49-151-61623918
Teckids e.V. · FrOSCon e.V. · OpenRheinRuhr e.V.
Fellowship of the FSFE ·
Hi Dominik,
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 12:44:18AM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
> newest version is in collab-maint, issues seem to be resolved.
>
> Please test, and, if satisfied, feel free to upload ;).
Very good. Unfortunately I can not test before next Monday. Mike
if you can run a test and up
Hi,
newest version is in collab-maint, issues seem to be resolved.
Please test, and, if satisfied, feel free to upload ;).
Cheers,
Nik
--
PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17 FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296
Dominik George · Mobil: +49-151-61623918
Teckids e.V. · FrOSCon e.V. · OpenRheinRuhr e
Hi
On Wed Jun 1 20:23:15 2016 GMT+0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 08:16:20PM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
> > We tried to avoid updateing to a new upstream commit as the one in use was
> > well-tested, but looking through the changes, there has been a big diff,
> > but
> >
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 08:16:20PM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
> We tried to avoid updateing to a new upstream commit as the one in use was
> well-tested, but looking through the changes, there has been a big diff, but
> almost all of it seems to be fixing warnings and code formatting.
>
> So r
Hi,
> > While I do agree with you, please give us a few more days (three, let's
> > say) to find a workaround. I have something schemed, but need to find out
> > whether it is too ugly to share or not ;).
> >
Something new:
Upstream actually seems to have a patch that fixes this issue.
We trie
On Mi 01 Jun 2016 11:31:49 CEST, Dominik George wrote:
Hi,
GTK3 and Qt5 are tricky in remote environments, anyway. It is mostly
because of upstream devs not being aware enough of remote desktop
technologies.
Personally, I think, we should / you should upload xrdp as is now to
Debian unstable
Hi,
> GTK3 and Qt5 are tricky in remote environments, anyway. It is mostly
> because of upstream devs not being aware enough of remote desktop
> technologies.
>
> Personally, I think, we should / you should upload xrdp as is now to
> Debian unstable (not experimental, really unstable) and open th
Hi Dominik, Andreas,
On Mi 01 Jun 2016 11:15:36 CEST, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 10:30:02AM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
We know that GTK3 and/or Qt5 components are somehow involved. They
seem to reset the layout in some way on startup. Why and how, I
don't know yet. I
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 10:30:02AM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
>
> We know that GTK3 and/or Qt5 components are somehow involved. They seem to
> reset the layout in some way on startup. Why and how, I don't know yet. I
> also do not know yet whether this is a GTK/Qt bug or an x11rdp bug. We see
Hi,
>> I've scheduled a session for that at our organisation's meeting this
>weekend.
>
>Any outcome of this session?
Yes, to some extent.
We know that GTK3 and/or Qt5 components are somehow involved. They seem to
reset the layout in some way on startup. Why and how, I don't know yet. I also
d
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 04:18:22PM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
> > > Well, at least I got hold of a client system fortesting by now.
> >
> > Fine. Just let me know if I should test in my system which actually has
> > shown the problem. I'd happily help out with testing.
>
> I've scheduled a se
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 03:20:58PM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Do you have any news for this last showstopper to upload the new version
> > (at least I'd upload once this is fixed).
>
> Well, at least I got hold of a client system fortesting by now.
Fine. Just let me know if I shou
> > Well, at least I got hold of a client system fortesting by now.
>
> Fine. Just let me know if I should test in my system which actually has
> shown the problem. I'd happily help out with testing.
I've scheduled a session for that at our organisation's meeting this weekend.
-nik
--
PGP-Fi
Hi,
> Do you have any news for this last showstopper to upload the new version
> (at least I'd upload once this is fixed).
Well, at least I got hold of a client system fortesting by now.
Cheers,
Nik
--
PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17 FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296
Dominik George · Mobil:
Hi Dominik,
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 07:21:24PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > I think we will be able to fix this issue.
>
> Sound promissing after "setxkbmap de" seems to fix the issue.
Do you have any news for this last showstopper to upload the new version
(at least I'd upload once thi
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 07:09:37PM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
> > I definitely needed to install xorgxrdp as well to get my normal desktop
> > as usual. While on normal apt-get installs Recommends are installed I
> > wonder what alternative could bring up a sensible desktop otherwise and
> > wha
Hi,
> My first attempt to connect from a windows machine to my test linux box
> just brings up a ligthblue empty space (same color as xrdp login screen)
> but no window manager or desktop environment (I'm using xfce by
> default).
>
> I definitely needed to install xorgxrdp as well to get my norm
Hi Dominik,
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:00:32PM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
> Him
>
> > Seems like you forgot to add debian/startwm.sh to the repository.
>
> Oops, yes, it got lost somewhere.
>
> I added it now.
Thanks. I think we are quite there. I cleaned up the changelog from my
previous
Him
> Seems like you forgot to add debian/startwm.sh to the repository.
Oops, yes, it got lost somewhere.
I added it now.
-nik
--
PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17 FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296
Dominik George · Mobil: +49-151-61623918
Teckids e.V. · FrOSCon e.V. · OpenRheinRuhr e.V.
Fel
Hi Dominik,
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:06:55PM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
> >How has got this knowledge and how.
>
> We have been running this commit in production for almost a year. We started
> with what used to be HEAD for a very long time. It was bleeding edge whem we
> started. The speci
Hi Mike,
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:17:07AM +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
>
> Personally, I am not a great fan of gbp. It has caused me more trouble than
> served any good (and I really think that gbp is a great tool for Debian
> packaging, as I said, my personal workflow does not use it).
>
> What
Hi Dominik,
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:06:55PM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
>
> We have been running this commit in production for almost a year. We started
> with what used to be HEAD for a very long time. It was bleeding edge whem we
> started. The specific commit used now is that state that
Hi Andreas,
On Di 19 Apr 2016 12:00:39 CEST, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Dominik,
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:49:38AM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
>> * It only contains debian/ now.
>
>Do you have any reason for this?
Yes, because that's what Mike originally asked for, unless I got him wrong.
Hi,
might I suggest keeping the old and new xrdp packages in parallel for a
while? Maybe call the latter xrdp-git, then fold it into xrdp once there is
a release? It sounds to me like there were quite a lot of (upstream)
changes between the two and I'm not sure how clean the upgrade path is,
teeth
Hi Andreas,
>How has got this knowledge and how.
We have been running this commit in production for almost a year. We started
with what used to be HEAD for a very long time. It was bleeding edge whem we
started. The specific commit used now is that state that was „stable“ for the
repo for a lo
Hi Dominik,
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:49:38AM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
> >> * It only contains debian/ now.
> >
> >Do you have any reason for this?
>
> Yes, because that's what Mike originally asked for, unless I got him wrong.
I do not see any good reason for this kind of advise. Mike, c
Hi,
>> * It only contains debian/ now.
>
>Do you have any reason for this?
Yes, because that's what Mike originally asked for, unless I got him wrong.
>I'm missing the background knowledge to decide this so I'll leave this
>to you. I have no idea about the motivation to pick a specific commit
Hi Dominik,
thanks for working on xrdp and commiting to the repository.
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 09:34:35PM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
> * It only contains debian/ now.
Do you have any reason for this?
> * get-orig-source fetches sources from GitHub, depending on package
>version and tw
HI Nik,
theres for giving your time to this.
On Mo 18 Apr 2016 21:34:35 CEST, Dominik George wrote:
Hi,
I updated the repo in collab-maint to the following state:
* It only contains debian/ now.
* get-orig-source fetches sources from GitHub, depending on package
version and two variab
Hi,
I updated the repo in collab-maint to the following state:
* It only contains debian/ now.
* get-orig-source fetches sources from GitHub, depending on package
version and two variables inrules to determine the versions of
librfxcodec and xorgxrdp. I decided to create a single
sour
Hi Dominik,
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 12:45:47PM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
> Also, I kindly ask you to co-maintain the package after I got it finalised on
> Monday.
Comaintenance is confirmed.
Thanks for the status upgrade
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Hi Andreas,
> I'm afraid I'm getting on your nerves […]
No, you absolutely don't. You are actually right in every single point.
> Is it really that hard to take
> the repository where official xrdp was maintained and if nothing else
> helps
>
> rsync -a --delete -v
>
> commit all changes
Hi Dominik,
I'm afraid I'm getting on your nerves but we are chatting now way to
long how to to get xrdp finalised. I asked you several times how I
could help and there is no response. Is it really that hard to take
the repository where official xrdp was maintained and if nothing else
helps
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 01:40:40PM +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
>
> I think that all previous uploads to Debian should be in the repo. Plus your
> changes.
+1
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Hi Nik,
On Fr 01 Apr 2016 14:47:52 CEST, Dominik George wrote:
Hi,
> Yes, I know that. However, the only problem to be solved is merging the
> two repositories, and having some remotes dangling around doing so does
> not make it easier.
If you ask me you should not put too much effort into t
Hi,
> > Yes, I know that. However, the only problem to be solved is merging the
> > two repositories, and having some remotes dangling around doing so does
> > not make it easier.
> If you ask me you should not put too much effort into this merge. The
> main thing is that it somehow can be unders
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:03:13PM +0100, Dominik George wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >sorry for nagging constantly but you expected to be done until middle
> >of
> >last week.
>
> No. I said I'd be done until middle of *this* week, and I actually got
> publishing the stuff on my todo list for tomorrow.
??
Hi Dominik,
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 12:47:33PM +0100, Dominik George wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for some inobvious reason, I cannot push to the repo in collab-maint…
An alternative strategy would be to simply copy it over on
git.debian.org to debian-edu space and push there.
Thanks for your work on xrdp
>An alternative strategy would be to simply copy it over on
>git.debian.org to debian-edu space and push there.
The issue is that I messed up some commits in the history.
I think I will do a manual merge of the changes instead…
-nik
--
PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17 FD26 B79A 3C16 A0
Hi,
for some inobvious reason, I cannot push to the repo in collab-maint…
But working on it.
-nik
--
PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17 FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296
Dominik George · Mobil: +49-151-61623918
Teckids e.V. · FrOSCon e.V. · OpenRheinRuhr e.V.
Fellowship of the FSFE · Piratenp
Hi,
>sorry for nagging constantly but you expected to be done until middle
>of
>last week.
No. I said I'd be done until middle of *this* week, and I actually got
publishing the stuff on my todo list for tomorrow.
>Could you please, pretty please be more transparent by
>commiting your work to so
Hi again Dominik,
sorry for nagging constantly but you expected to be done until middle of
last week. Could you please, pretty please be more transparent by
commiting your work to some public place. It does not help at all if
you silently work on problems others could help with.
Thanks
A
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 11:21:32PM +0100, Dominik George wrote:
>
> In that case, please let us finalise the work ;). I expect it to be done
> until
> middle of the week.
Just for my understanding: To what repository are you pushing
intermediate changes to follow your steps?
Kind regards and
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 11:21:32PM +0100, Dominik George wrote:
> In that case, please let us finalise the work ;). I expect it to be done
> until
> middle of the week.
Sounds good. My favourite way to do this would be to clone
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/xrdp.git
to the ne
Hi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 06:59:32PM +0100, Dominik George wrote:
> > most of your concerns are being addressed already (restoring history and
> > such).
> The current master branch of the repository you named[1] starts with
>
>
> xrdp (0.9.0~git20150318-1~alpha1) teckids; urgency=medium
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 06:59:32PM +0100, Dominik George wrote:
> most of your concerns are being addressed already (restoring history and
> such).
The current master branch of the repository you named[1] starts with
xrdp (0.9.0~git20150318-1~alpha1) teckids; urgency=medium
* New upstre
Hi,
most of your concerns are being addressed already (restoring history and such).
Please do not make it more difficult, an experienced DD (Mike Gabriel) is
working with us.
> 3. Why do you plan
> a) a non-official (random?) Git commit rather than a release?
Because there is no current
[Setting reply-to Debian-Edu]
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 06:29:12PM +0100, Dominik George wrote:
> >If anybody of the people responding tp the ITA bug like to become the
> >main maintainer of the package I'd be more than happy to sponsor the
> >package. As far as the situation is now I'll upload my
Hi,
>> Yes, no problem. The package is up to adoption but there is already
>an
>> ITA. See #719624. However, I didn't get more news since January. But
>I
>> didn't try to reach out.
>
>If anybody of the people responding tp the ITA bug like to become the
>main maintainer of the package I'd be more
Hi Vincent,
thanks fro the quick response.
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 03:07:51PM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 8 mars 2016 15:03 +0100, Andreas Tille :
>
> > since I need an up to date xrdp at work I upgraded the packaging in
> > collab-maint to the latest upstream version. Considering the p
65 matches
Mail list logo
