Bug#689858: Bug#715555: gnome package has icedove and xul-ext-adblock-plus incompatibility

2013-10-17 Thread Jonathan Dowland
tags 689858 +pending thanks > This was already addressed in a stable upload. We just need to merge > the change for the unstable branch at some time. Cool, thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas..

Bug#689858: Bug#715555: gnome package has icedove and xul-ext-adblock-plus incompatibility

2013-10-17 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 17.10.2013 10:56, schrieb Jonathan Dowland: > tags 689858 +patch > thanks > > On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 03:01:21AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> For the sake of sanity, please do that. This dependency is constantly >> creating headaches as installations or dist-upgrades constantly >>

Bug#689858: Bug#715555: gnome package has icedove and xul-ext-adblock-plus incompatibility

2013-10-17 Thread Jonathan Dowland
tags 689858 +patch thanks On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 03:01:21AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > For the sake of sanity, please do that. This dependency is constantly > creating headaches as installations or dist-upgrades constantly > fail when either Iceweasel or Icedove are out of sync ver

Bug#715555: gnome package has icedove and xul-ext-adblock-plus incompatibility

2013-09-04 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> Nod, I've seen those recent allegations I'm concerned about that too. > So I'd actually be ok/prefer if we drop that dependency altogether > (for both unstable and stable). For the sake of sanity, please do that. This dependency is constantly creating headaches as installations or dist-upgrades

Bug#715555: gnome package has icedove and xul-ext-adblock-plus incompatibility

2013-08-18 Thread Olivier Berger
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 02:12:03PM +0200, r...@libertysurf.fr wrote: > > Would it be possible to follow security team advices, and remove > xul-ext-adblock-plus from gnome package ? > May I suggest to merge this with #689858 as these seem quite similar to me. Would be great to have maintainer

Bug#715555: gnome package has icedove and xul-ext-adblock-plus incompatibility

2013-07-11 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 11.07.2013 21:49, schrieb Moritz Muehlenhoff: > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 02:12:03PM +0200, r...@libertysurf.fr wrote: >> >> Package: gnome >> Version: 1:3.4+7 >> >> Hello, >> updating from squeeze to wheezy, I got a dependency problem with gnome. In >> french, it says : >> >> Les paquets sui

Bug#715555: gnome package has icedove and xul-ext-adblock-plus incompatibility

2013-07-11 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 02:12:03PM +0200, r...@libertysurf.fr wrote: > > Package: gnome > Version: 1:3.4+7 > > Hello, > updating from squeeze to wheezy, I got a dependency problem with gnome. In > french, it says : > > Les paquets suivants ont des dépendances non satisfaites : > xul-ext-ad

Bug#715555: gnome package has icedove and xul-ext-adblock-plus incompatibility

2013-07-10 Thread r . 3
Package: gnome Version: 1:3.4+7 Hello, updating from squeeze to wheezy, I got a dependency problem with gnome. In french, it says : Les paquets suivants ont des dépendances non satisfaites : xul-ext-adblock-plus : Casse: icedove (> 16.0~a1+) mais 17.0.7-1~deb7u1 est installé. Indeed, gn