On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 03:48:03PM -0700, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 10:01:31PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 14:26 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> > > On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 at 15:48, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> > > > This patch replaces the one I posted yes
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 10:01:31PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 14:26 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 at 15:48, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> > > This patch replaces the one I posted yesterday. I like this better since
> > > it doesn't require fixing existing o
On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 14:26 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 at 15:48, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> > This patch replaces the one I posted yesterday. I like this better since
> > it doesn't require fixing existing on-disk cookies or skipping a
> > position in the in-inode index table.
On 08/15/2013 04:26 PM, Christian Kujau wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 at 15:48, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
>> This patch replaces the one I posted yesterday. I like this better since
>> it doesn't require fixing existing on-disk cookies or skipping a
>> position in the in-inode index table.
>
> Thanks. A
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 at 15:48, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> This patch replaces the one I posted yesterday. I like this better since
> it doesn't require fixing existing on-disk cookies or skipping a
> position in the in-inode index table.
Thanks. Applied to 3.11-rc5 and tested, no more "readdir loop" me
This patch replaces the one I posted yesterday. I like this better since
it doesn't require fixing existing on-disk cookies or skipping a
position in the in-inode index table.
NFSv4 reserves readdir cookie values 0-2 for special entries (. and ..),
but jfs allows a value of 2 for a non-special ent
6 matches
Mail list logo
