On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:06 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> On 05/05/2015 08:18 PM, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
>> Yup, I consider you a friend of mine. We can work together on this
>> package and you or others may check my version[1] until the license
>> issue is settled.
>
> Ah, that
Hi Adrian,
@Oliver: Do you agree that we are 100% safe on the license now?
Yes.
> If you agree, please cut down the LICENSE [1] file to the lines 42
> through 58.
Done:
https://github.com/cc65/cc65/commit/aeb849257277a6b98542de8579697b81c6dd70e6
Regards,
Oliver
On 05/05/2015 08:18 PM, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
>> Me too. ;)
> Took a quick check with a browser into your packaging. It's old
> style, but looks promising.
I'm looking forward to see the first package when it's done. If you
agree, I'd like to have a look at it as well before you go ahea
On 05/05/2015 08:42 PM, Spiro Trikaliotis wrote:
> Please note that Uz insisted on any contribution to cc65 to be licensed
> under zlib license. Thus, the only parts and contributions that might
> not fall under zlib are the parts that were there when Uz took over the
> project.
>
> Thus, it does
Hello Adrian,
* On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 04:27:56PM +0200 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 05/05/2015 03:52 PM, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> > This is not authoritative. For example someone could sent an email to
> > Ullrich with his/her patch. As it was not commited by the contributor
>
Hello,
* On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 02:54:19PM +0200 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 05/05/2015 02:17 PM, Oliver Schmidt wrote:
> Uhm, I think you are taking this way too serious. I don't think that
> anyone who ever contributed to cc65 besides Ullrich and John would not
> agree to have the c
Hi Spiro,
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Spiro Trikaliotis
wrote:
> * On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 06:35:11PM +0200 László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
>> To be honest, I've already packaged it.
>
> Me too. ;)
Took a quick check with a browser into your packaging. It's old
style, but looks promising.
>
Hi Adrian,
Who if not Ullrich is authoritative to give such a statement regarding
> the license of the code. He wrote - by far - the largest portions of the
> code and supervised all contributions. I am pretty sure we can take his
> word on that.
>
Full ACK !
Regards,
Oliver
On 05/05/2015 03:52 PM, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> This is not authoritative. For example someone could sent an email to
> Ullrich with his/her patch. As it was not commited by the contributor
> but Ullrich, the person's identity is lost.
Well, then Ullrich didn't use the version control s
Hi Laszlo,
> $ git clone g...@github.com:cc65/cc65.git
> > $ cd cc65
> > $ git log --all --format='%aN <%cE>' | sort -u
> This is not authoritative. For example someone could sent an email to
> Ullrich with his/her patch.
I know for sure that this was in fact done. When Ullrich started with cc6
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 3:27 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> On 05/05/2015 03:08 PM, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
>> Then the first step is to ask everyone you (we?) know to allow the
>> relicensing of the whole cc65. This means all contributors of the code
>> who ever changed something
On 05/05/2015 03:08 PM, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> Then the first step is to ask everyone you (we?) know to allow the
> relicensing of the whole cc65. This means all contributors of the code
> who ever changed something in it, even a single character. Do others
> like John R. Dunning or Ull
Hi Oliver,
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Oliver Schmidt wrote:
> Iff everything else is settled regarding packaging (incl. licensing) I'll
> reach out to the list members and ask for last-minute contribtions. If that
> phase is over I'll add a tag to the Git repo.
OK, sounds good.
>> If possi
On 05/05/2015 02:17 PM, Oliver Schmidt wrote:
I made a statement about _my_ contributions to cc65. I don't know who else
has contributed to cc65 before I started to maintain the upstream repo. In
fact I personally don't see how an exhaustive list of contributors can be
archived. And without ackno
Hi Laszlo,
>> On the other hand, Oliver promised me to
> >> add something like a consecutive number if I really need it for
> >> packaging purposes.
> > I can confirm this.
>
> Please do it then to confirm which commit should be considered a
> stable release.
Iff everything else is settled reg
Hi,
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Oliver Schmidt wrote:
>> The man pages could be generated with help2man, or they could point to
>> the GNU info files.
> It seems that
> linuxdoc -B txt --man <...>
> groff -man <...>
> might be another option.
Will check this once I get home.
>> On t
Hi,
The man pages could be generated with help2man, or they could point to
> the GNU info files.
>
It seems that
linuxdoc -B txt --man <...>
groff -man <...>
might be another option. As far as I remember Ullrich did that in former
times. If someone tests it I'd be willing to add it to
htt
Hello László,
* On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 06:35:11PM +0200 László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> To be honest, I've already packaged it.
Me too. ;)
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:strik/cc65
I know, it does not hold to Debian's standards, but this is something I
could work on if the pa
Hi all related people,
To be honest, I've already packaged it. I've two problems above the
license issue. None of the tools have neither a manpage nor a HTML
documentation. Then there's no tag or any version number in the GitHub
repository.
Anyway, I'd like to have it in Debian as I already have s
19 matches
Mail list logo
