On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 07:54:18 +0200 Niels Thykier wrote:
> Please note the following statement from Debian's diversity statement[1]:
>
> """
> We welcome contributions from everyone as long as they interact
> constructively with our community.
> """
>
> As such, Debian does not (and will not)
On 2015-07-26 23:57, Tsu Jan wrote:
> [...]
>
Hi,
> All in all, it's weird that in spite of Dave's and my early warnings,
> this problem still arose.
I have not been following this from the beginning, so I do not know what
said warning is.
> Isn't Debian a community-based distro?
Personally,
On 2015-07-27 07:20, 1...@o2o2.tk wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 02:00:02 +0430 Tsu Jan wrote:
>> > On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 20:59:22 + 1...@o2o2.tk wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Yes, nvidia drivers installed via nvidia's installer. But what should I
>>> > > do
>>> > > to fix this issue?
>> >
>>
On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 02:00:02 +0430 Tsu Jan wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 20:59:22 + 1...@o2o2.tk wrote:
> >
> >
> > Yes, nvidia drivers installed via nvidia's installer. But what should I do
> > to fix this issue?
>
> You should install the nVidia deb packages instead. Try the experimental
> re
This is my 64-bit package at last:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7793460/libqtgui4_4.8.7%2Bdfsg-1_amd64.deb
I made it with the patch in question in addition to the standard Debian
patches for qt4-4.8.7+dfsg-1, under Debian Testing. It works well for me
under both Enlightenment and KDE
On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 20:59:22 + 1...@o2o2.tk wrote:
>
>
> Yes, nvidia drivers installed via nvidia's installer. But what should I
> do
> to fix this issue?
You should install the nVidia deb packages instead. Try the experimental
repository for that but always have a light environment
Yes, nvidia drivers installed via nvidia's installer. But what should I
do
to fix this issue?
On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 01:13:16 +0430 Tsu Jan wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 20:26:49 + 1...@o2o2.tk wrote:
> > Thanks for you solution, I previously tried "official wa
On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 20:26:49 + 1...@o2o2.tk wrote:
> Thanks for you solution, I previously tried "official way" as described in
debian documentation and totally failed. Now almost there compilation
success (with patch applied), but it refuses to build package, with error
message:
>
> dp
Thanks for you solution, I previously tried "official way" as described in
debian documentation and totally failed. Now almost there compilation
success (with patch applied), but it refuses to build package, with error
message:
dpkg-shlibdeps: error: no dependency information found for /usr
On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 18:27:53 + 1...@o2o2.tk wrote:
> However I'm not sure if I did all things properly ...
Clean compilation and deb packaging is easy (maybe not for CPU though):
(1) Get the source and the debian folder from:
http://http.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qt4-x11/qt4-x11_4.8.7+df
32-bit is far less important, because on 64-bit system it's needed for skype
only (at least for me). All other apps used as daily driver are 64 bit. I
tried to compile on core i7 and I finished with compilation error as shown
above, after approx 5 minutes. So it's possible you didn't reached t
On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 17:36:59 + 1...@o2o2.tk wrote:
>
>
> Are you patching qt from sid (4_4.8.7)? You said you interrupted
> compilation, are you able to finish it with success?
I'm on Testing but the qt4 version is the same (4.8.7). With the 2-core CPU of
my desktop computer, compilat
Are you patching qt from sid (4_4.8.7)? You said you interrupted
compilation, are you able to finish it with success?
I'm on 64-bit Sid but I actually need both 32 and 64 bit packages.
32-bit
for skype and 64-bit for all others (qmmp, vlc). If it works for you,
can you share
On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 12:47:03 + 1...@o2o2.tk wrote:
> I can't compile qt after applying above patch from ubuntu:
On 64-bit machine, I added the attached patch to the standard debian patches
of qt4-4.8.7 and got no compilation error after 5 minutes, although I
interrupted the compilation proce
On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 10:48:07 -0300 "Lisandro
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dami=E1n_Nicanor_P=E9rez?= Meyer" wrote:
> That's the perfect way to break your system...
I was cautious when doing that and my system works well. The compilation were
compatible, otherwise my Qt4 apps wouldn't work. My Debian is Tes
On Sunday 26 July 2015 17:56:19 Tsu Jan wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 12:47:03 + 1...@o2o2.tk wrote:
> > I can't compile qt after applying above patch from ubuntu...
>
> Most probably, you don't need to recompile Qt4. Just get:
>
> libqtgui4_4.8.6+git64-g5dc8b2b+dfsg-3~ubuntu6.1_amd64.deb
> an
On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 12:47:03 + 1...@o2o2.tk wrote:
> I can't compile qt after applying above patch from ubuntu...
Most probably, you don't need to recompile Qt4. Just get:
libqtgui4_4.8.6+git64-g5dc8b2b+dfsg-3~ubuntu6.1_amd64.deb
and/or
libqtgui4_4.8.6+git64-g5dc8b2b+dfsg-3~ubuntu6.1_i386.deb
I can't compile qt after applying above patch from ubuntu:
til/qsystemtrayicon_x11.cpp:59:8: error: ‘QSystemTrayIconSys’ has not
been declared
Window QSystemTrayIconSys::sysTrayWindow = XNone;
^
util/qsystemtrayicon_x11.cpp:60:7: error: ‘QSystemTrayIconSys’ was not
declared in this scope
No maintainer uses E19 or Plasma5!? sni-qt is needed by them.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
I applied the above-mentioned Qt4 patch successfully and sni-qt worked under
E19. Is there any chance that Debian includes it for Qt4 as Ubuntu does? There
will be no Qt4 update and, without the patch, Debian KDE users will have
problems with systray icons of Qt4 apps in the near future.
--
T
It seems that for sni-qt to work, Qt4 should to be patched with:
https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~indicator-applet-developers/sni-qt/trunk.13.04/view/head:/patches/qsystemtrayicon-plugin-system-4.7.4.diff
It's needed with any systray that works based on appindicator. Enlightenment
already has it an
21 matches
Mail list logo
