On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 09:38:35AM +0300, Jari wrote:
> Simon, could you consider simply adding an exception:
>
> IF first line contains "building.*libmd"
> AND the second line contain "zfsutils"
> THEN
> Ignore reporting non-verbose-build
Hello Jari,
I don't think adding package-spe
On 2013-08-14 21:50, Simon Ruderich wrote:
| On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 02:12:55PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
| > However, it reports zfsutils to hide compiler flags [3]
|
| building shared library libmd.so.1
|
| This matches the general "non-verbose-build" regex. To prevent
| too many false positi
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 02:12:55PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
> However, it reports zfsutils to hide compiler flags, which it doesn't [3].
> Please
> check more careful for false positives.
Hello Arno,
Sorry for the late reply.
Checking for hidden compiler flags is difficult and I haven't
found a
Package: blhc
Severity: normal
While discussing verbose build logs as a Jessie release goal [1]. The list of
affected packages is generated by [2] which in turn uses blhc.
However, it reports zfsutils to hide compiler flags, which it doesn't [3].
Please
check more careful for false positives.
4 matches
Mail list logo
