By the way,
> Unknown option: -a
> usage: btrfs [--help] [--version] [...] []
This is the output of "btrfs" command. "btrfsck" reacts different:
> btrfsck -a
> usage: btrfs check [options]
It seems wrong binary is being called.
--
Tomasz TorczThere exists no separation bet
Suggested Workaround:
https://wiki.debian.org/Btrfs
The brtfsck don't support the standard -a option. To haven't this problem
you can make it:
dpkg-divert --add --rename --divert /sbin/fsck.btrfs.real /sbin/fsck.btrfs
And create the executable file /sbin/fsck.btrfs with this wrapper by
exemple:
Package: btrfs-tools
Version: 0.19+20130315-2
Followup-For: Bug #709217
Hello,
Just to confirm the bug.
I did the update btrfs-tools yesterday, and the system was arrested on fsck
from util-linux 2.20.1 as steve showed.
It's not dramatic, but it is annoying. It just would have the option "-a"
pas
Control: reassign -1 btrfs-tools
Control: found -1 20130315-2
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 07:00:57PM +0200, JP Pozzi wrote:
> Package: initscripts
> Version: 2.88dsf-41
> Severity: normal
> Dear Maintainer,
> I get a message at system startup as "fsck" is incorrect for btrfs
> file-systems
> :
> Lo
Package: initscripts
Version: 2.88dsf-41
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I get a message at system startup as "fsck" is incorrect for btrfs file-systems
:
Log of fsck -C -R -A -a
Tue May 21 18:32:07 2013
fsck from util-linux 2.20.1
Unknown option: -a
usage: btrfs [--help] [--version] [...]
5 matches
Mail list logo
