tag 705613 +patch +pending
thanks
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:40:29 +0200
"Stephen Röttger" wrote:
> > Stephen, could you please help us and look at modifying your patch
> > so that it applies on 2.1.10? My own Erlang skills are not up to
> > this task. I'm referring to this Debian bug report [1].
On 25.04.2013 14:27, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
> Stephen, could you please help us and look at modifying your patch so
> that it applies on 2.1.10? My own Erlang skills are not up to this
> task. I'm referring to this Debian bug report [1]. And the release
> time is unfortunately very close.
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:48:44 -0400
Joey Hess wrote:
> > Do you know of any conventional XMPP client (I mean something other
> > than git-annex) which supports SCRAM-SHA-1 so that I could test
> > that the patch did not break things for other clients?
> >
> > I'm asking because
> > 1) I asked a f
Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
> Do you know of any conventional XMPP client (I mean something other than
> git-annex) which supports SCRAM-SHA-1 so that I could test that the
> patch did not break things for other clients?
>
> I'm asking because
> 1) I asked a fellow Process One developer what he th
Package: ejabberd
Version: 2.1.9
Severity: important
This version of ejabberd added support for SCRAM-SHA-1 authentication.
Unfortunatly, it rejects RFC-compliant GS2 headers, containing the "a="
parameter.
Here is an upstream bug report with a test case and a patch
against current upstream git,
5 matches
Mail list logo
