Bug#701776: fsck.btrfs do not accept -a so the system will not boot anymore

2013-03-04 Thread Roger Leigh
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 07:16:25AM -0600, Tim Cuthbertson wrote: > I confirm Axel Beckert's statement in message #60. My system cannot boot > with the latest patch 0.19+20130131-2 Note that for compatibility with fsck you must support at a minimum (even if you ignore them) the following options:

Bug#701776: fsck.btrfs do not accept -a so the system will not boot anymore

2013-02-28 Thread Tim Cuthbertson
I confirm Axel Beckert's statement in message #60. My system cannot boot with the latest patch 0.19+20130131-2 Tim Cuthbertson

Bug#701776: fsck.btrfs do not accept -a so the system will not boot anymore

2013-02-27 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi Dmitrijs, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > > According to /var/log/fsck/checkroot it's called with "fsck -C -a -t > > btrfs /run/rootdev". See also /etc/init.d/checkfs.sh. > > Does something like in the attached patch works? Unfortunately not: fsck still aborts with the error message "Unknown optio

Bug#701776: fsck.btrfs do not accept -a so the system will not boot anymore

2013-02-27 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
On 27 February 2013 13:46, Axel Beckert wrote: > Hi, > > Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: >> > I think the following packaging change caused this issue: >> > >> >* Dropping fsck.patch, not needed anymore. >> > >> > Because this patch added code which made -a being accepted as option: >> >> But it shoul

Bug#701776: fsck.btrfs do not accept -a so the system will not boot anymore

2013-02-27 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > > I think the following packaging change caused this issue: > > > >* Dropping fsck.patch, not needed anymore. > > > > Because this patch added code which made -a being accepted as option: > > But it shouldn't be needed anymore, now that cmd_check function in >

Bug#701776: fsck.btrfs do not accept -a so the system will not boot anymore

2013-02-27 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
On 27/02/13 13:05, Axel Beckert wrote: > Control: tag -1 + patch > > Hi, > > Klaus Ethgen wrote: >> Package: btrfs-tools >> Version: 0.19+20130131-1 >> Severity: important >> >> The new fsck.btrfs do not ignore »-a« or handle it propperly as other >> fsck do. Do this version breaks package initsc

Bug#701776: fsck.btrfs do not accept -a so the system will not boot anymore

2013-02-27 Thread Axel Beckert
Control: tag -1 + patch Hi, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > Package: btrfs-tools > Version: 0.19+20130131-1 > Severity: important > > The new fsck.btrfs do not ignore »-a« or handle it propperly as other > fsck do. Do this version breaks package initscripts. When a system > start, checkfs.sh will check al

Bug#701776: fsck.btrfs do not accept -a so the system will not boot anymore

2013-02-27 Thread Yann SOUBEYRAND
I can confirm that it's impossible to boot on a btrfs root partition with the new btrfs-tools package. Cheers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#701776: fsck.btrfs do not accept -a so the system will not boot anymore

2013-02-26 Thread Klaus Ethgen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Package: btrfs-tools Version: 0.19+20130131-1 Severity: important The new fsck.btrfs do not ignore »-a« or handle it propperly as other fsck do. Do this version breaks package initscripts. When a system start, checkfs.sh will check all file systems