On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Control: block -1 by 689508 689202
>
> debsums (2.0.49) unstable; urgency=low
> * when querying dpkg-divert include the user specified root filesystem
> in --admindir (Closes: #632463)
>
> piatti is running 2.0.48+nmu3
Perhaps this
On 2013-02-22 18:27, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Or upload the wheezy version to backports.org and install that on piatti.
Not perfect, but still better than debsums/squeeze.
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
Hi,
On Freitag, 22. Februar 2013, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> For #689202 I could do a NMU, but unfortunately for #689508 I cant offer
> a nice clean solution. Then we could get debsums unblocked, into wheezy
> and backport it and finally install it on piatti.
>
> Or we could add a modified copy of
Control: block -1 by 689508 689202
On 2013-02-22 05:19, Dave Steele wrote:
> While looking at the piatti piuparts report Andreas pointed to today,
> I noticed that failures are racking up for debsums modifications.
> http://piuparts.debian.org/sid/fail/binutils-multiarch_2.22-7.1.log
>
> /org/
package: piuparts
severity: normal
While looking at the piatti piuparts report Andreas pointed to today,
I noticed that failures are racking up for debsums modifications.
The debsums man page, under Caveats, says that files which have been
replaced by another package may be erroneously reported a
5 matches
Mail list logo
