On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 12:41:37AM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 08:29:10AM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:53:01AM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 07:37:03AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > Given these, I
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 08:29:10AM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:53:01AM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 07:37:03AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Given these, I am not convinced that this should be RC for wheezy.
> > How about a NEWS ite
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:53:01AM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 07:37:03AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Given these, I am not convinced that this should be RC for wheezy.
> How about a NEWS item drawing attention to the issue and workaround,
> and a downgrade to
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 07:37:03AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: bind9
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
> Please see https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-00855 for details.
Hello,
I'm providing a summary of the issue following my investigation as
a
Package: bind9
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Please see https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-00855 for details.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@
5 matches
Mail list logo