Bug#695935: RM: nipy/0.1.999-2

2013-01-01 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Thanks! On Tue, 01 Jan 2013, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:23:51 -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: rm > > 0.1.999 was a pre-release uploaded before the freeze, w

Bug#695935: RM: nipy/0.1.999-2

2013-01-01 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:23:51 -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: rm > > 0.1.999 was a pre-release uploaded before the freeze, while 0.2 was uploaded > shortly after the release and besides

Bug#695935: RM: nipy/0.1.999-2

2012-12-15 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012, Julien Cristau wrote: > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > Block request for 0.2-1, filed in July, was finally rejected due to "too > > late" > > reason [0]. Upon discussion with upstream [1], we decided that it would be > > better > > for all not to ship 0.1.999 at all in Debia

Bug#695935: RM: nipy/0.1.999-2

2012-12-15 Thread Julien Cristau
Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:23:51 -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: rm > > 0.1.999 was a pre-release uploaded before the freeze, while 0.2 was uploaded > shortly aft

Bug#695935: RM: nipy/0.1.999-2

2012-12-14 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm 0.1.999 was a pre-release uploaded before the freeze, while 0.2 was uploaded shortly after the release and besides fixing countless bugs it had quite a bit of restructuring/docs changes forbiddin