Hi,
in short: The new patches you proposed work (as attached for the current
versions in unstable and experimental, resp.)! :-)
Now, we can support powerpc, powerpcspe and spev1, even fixing the bsd
specific stuff (t-spe) upstream.
Thanks,
Roland
--- debian/patches/gcc-multiarch.diff.orig 2012-
On 12/17/2012 01:58 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Consider the attached patch: It does the same as the first patch but via
>> tm_file_list instead of tm_file as described above. (Applying to the
>> version in unstable, and with the experimental version there is
>> generally the same issue.)
>
> the
Am 15.12.2012 14:16, schrieb Roland Stigge:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On 14/12/12 15:37, Roland Stigge wrote:
>> That's what current upstream does in src/gcc/config.gcc: e500-double.h
>> is added to the tm_file (list) to make the distinction between v1 and
>> default/v2.
>>
>> If you don't have another s
Hi Matthias,
On 14/12/12 15:37, Roland Stigge wrote:
> That's what current upstream does in src/gcc/config.gcc: e500-double.h
> is added to the tm_file (list) to make the distinction between v1 and
> default/v2.
>
> If you don't have another suggestion, I would adjust upstream to do
> actually th
On 14/12/12 15:31, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 14.12.2012 15:19, schrieb Roland Stigge:
>>> but this one doesn't look for the v1/v0 distinction and uses the same
>>> multiarch
>>> tuple for both. Please bring it in a form which can go upstream.
>>
>> In your other mail you wrote about tm_file being
Am 14.12.2012 15:19, schrieb Roland Stigge:
>> but this one doesn't look for the v1/v0 distinction and uses the same
>> multiarch
>> tuple for both. Please bring it in a form which can go upstream.
>
> In your other mail you wrote about tm_file being replaced by
> tm_file_list. Should I assume th
On 14/12/12 14:49, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 14.12.2012 14:34, schrieb Roland Stigge:
>> On 14/12/12 14:10, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> Am 12.12.2012 13:26, schrieb Roland Stigge:
regarding your request to use t-spe, I'm attaching two patches, for the
unstable and experimental versions of
Am 14.12.2012 14:34, schrieb Roland Stigge:
> On 14/12/12 14:10, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Am 12.12.2012 13:26, schrieb Roland Stigge:
>>> regarding your request to use t-spe, I'm attaching two patches, for the
>>> unstable and experimental versions of gcc-4.7, respectively.
>>>
>>> As written befor
On 14/12/12 14:10, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 12.12.2012 13:26, schrieb Roland Stigge:
>> regarding your request to use t-spe, I'm attaching two patches, for the
>> unstable and experimental versions of gcc-4.7, respectively.
>>
>> As written before, in Debian, t-spe wasn't included properly (only
Am 12.12.2012 13:26, schrieb Roland Stigge:
> Hi,
>
> regarding your request to use t-spe, I'm attaching two patches, for the
> unstable and experimental versions of gcc-4.7, respectively.
>
> As written before, in Debian, t-spe wasn't included properly (only on
> some bsd variant). So doing it i
Am 12.12.2012 13:26, schrieb Roland Stigge:
> Hi,
>
> regarding your request to use t-spe, I'm attaching two patches, for the
> unstable and experimental versions of gcc-4.7, respectively.
>
> As written before, in Debian, t-spe wasn't included properly (only on
> some bsd variant). So doing it i
Hi,
regarding your request to use t-spe, I'm attaching two patches, for the
unstable and experimental versions of gcc-4.7, respectively.
As written before, in Debian, t-spe wasn't included properly (only on
some bsd variant). So doing it instead of t-linux in the powerpcspe
case, when spe is pres
12 matches
Mail list logo
