Bug#694761: unblock pre-approval: python-scipy missing sources, how to proceed

2013-01-21 Thread Julian Taylor
retitle 694761 unblock python-scipy: missing sources in tarball thanks after discussion wit jcristau in irc I prepared an upload regenerating all sources which was sponsored by Yaroslav Halchenko. Please unblock it for wheezy, as it does not fix a (known) runtime issue you can take your time. --

Bug#694761: unblock pre-approval: python-scipy missing sources, how to proceed

2013-01-02 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 13:09:53 +0100, Julian Taylor wrote: > On 01/02/2013 11:53 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 00:55:27 +0100, Julian Taylor wrote: > > > >>> They were generated with 2.0.1 and 2.0.4 vs 2.0.7 in testing > >>> the difference is mostly bugfixes and minor en

Bug#694761: unblock pre-approval: python-scipy missing sources, how to proceed

2013-01-02 Thread Julian Taylor
On 01/02/2013 11:53 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 00:55:27 +0100, Julian Taylor wrote: > >>> They were generated with 2.0.1 and 2.0.4 vs 2.0.7 in testing >>> the difference is mostly bugfixes and minor enhancements according to >>> swig release notes. >>> >> >> but this does

Bug#694761: unblock pre-approval: python-scipy missing sources, how to proceed

2013-01-02 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 00:55:27 +0100, Julian Taylor wrote: > > They were generated with 2.0.1 and 2.0.4 vs 2.0.7 in testing > > the difference is mostly bugfixes and minor enhancements according to > > swig release notes. > > > > but this does not look so good: > SWIG-2.0.8 summary: > - Fix a

Bug#694761: unblock pre-approval: python-scipy missing sources, how to proceed

2012-12-11 Thread Julian Taylor
> They were generated with 2.0.1 and 2.0.4 vs 2.0.7 in testing > the difference is mostly bugfixes and minor enhancements according to > swig release notes. > but this does not look so good: SWIG-2.0.8 summary: - Fix a couple of regressions introduced in 2.0.5 and 2.0.7. - Minor fixes/enhancement

Bug#694761: unblock pre-approval: python-scipy missing sources, how to proceed

2012-12-11 Thread Julian Taylor
On 11/30/2012 12:46 AM, Julian Taylor wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > hello, > > I'm asking for advice on how to proceed with bug 589731. > The missing sources problem there is solved in svn [1, r23110,