Bug#693197: RFS: mozilla-gnome-keyring/0.6.5-1

2012-12-14 Thread Michael Biebl
On 15.12.2012 04:06, Michael Biebl wrote: > How does this exactly work? How does the iceweasel extension know that > it should load libgnomekeyring.so whereas the icedove extension should > load libgnomekeyring-icedove.so? nvm, found it in the mean time: the chrome.manifest maps the libraries to

Bug#693197: RFS: mozilla-gnome-keyring/0.6.5-1

2012-12-14 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi again, On 15.12.2012 04:06, Michael Biebl wrote: Hi Ximin, I'm mostly interested in this change in 0.6.6-1: * Build separate libraries against both xulrunner-dev and icedove-dev. (Closes: #690324) So I can rebuild the extension for iceweasel/icedove 7.

Bug#693197: RFS: mozilla-gnome-keyring/0.6.5-1

2012-12-14 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi Ximin, I'm mostly interested in this change in 0.6.6-1: * Build separate libraries against both xulrunner-dev and icedove-dev. (Closes: #690324) So I can rebuild the extension for iceweasel/icedove 7. I see that the package now builds /usr/lib/xul-ext/gnome-keyring/platform/Linux_x86_6

Bug#693197: RFS: mozilla-gnome-keyring/0.6.5-1

2012-11-14 Thread Ximin Luo
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mozilla-gnome-keyring" * Package name: mozilla-gnome-keyring Version : 0.6.5-1 This is an update to an already existing package: http://packages.debian.org/source/experimenta