On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 16:12:48 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> You can upload this fix to tpu.
>
Approved.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi again, Jonathan,
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 04:12:48PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > > However, version 0.8.0-3 is already in unstable, so please
> > > make the version 0.8.0-2.1 instead.
> >
> > That's fine with me, but I guess the release team prefers +deb7u1 for
> > wheezy.
>
> Your c
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 04:08:29PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> > On 23-12-12 00:37, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> > > I prepared a TPU upload to fix the copyright file bug (#690394) in
> > > wheezy. The
> > > debdiff is attached.
> >
> > Looks good.
> Thanks for the review.
>
> > However, version 0.8
Hi Bas,
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:45:43PM +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> On 23-12-12 00:37, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> > I prepared a TPU upload to fix the copyright file bug (#690394) in wheezy.
> > The
> > debdiff is attached.
>
> Looks good.
Thanks for the review.
> However, version 0.8.0-3 is alr
On 23-12-12 00:37, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> I prepared a TPU upload to fix the copyright file bug (#690394) in wheezy. The
> debdiff is attached.
Looks good. However, version 0.8.0-3 is already in unstable, so please
make the version 0.8.0-2.1 instead.
Will you upload the package?
> I also include
retitle 690877 unblock: love/0.8.0-1+deb7u1 TPU pre-approval
tags 690877 - moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 07:11:10PM +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> On 11-11-12 18:40, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >> The new package fixes several RC and RG bugs. Compared to the previous
> >> unblock
> >> requ
Hi,
Bas Wijnen wrote (11 Nov 2012 18:11:10 GMT) :
> Hmm, good point, I hadn't thought of that. (I just fixed it to get the
> hardening flags patch in; the package was auto-rejected so I fixed the
> reason for that without thinking about freeze effects.) It is not the
> same version, and it probabl
On 11-11-12 18:40, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> The new package fixes several RC and RG bugs. Compared to the previous
>> unblock
>> request, this one also fixes the build depends (which is another RC bug).
>>
> How do I know using the system glee doesn't regress anything here? Is
> it the exact same
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 21:29:10 +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package love
>
> The new package fixes several RC and RG bugs. Compared to the previous unblock
> reque
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package love
The new package fixes several RC and RG bugs. Compared to the previous unblock
request, this one also fixes the build depends (which is another RC bug).
debdiff
10 matches
Mail list logo
