On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 18:09:32 +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 05:15:10PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 16:36:49 +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> >
> > > +nwchem (6.1-5) unstable; urgency=low
> > > +
> > > + * Reverted subversion revisions 3824, 38
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 05:15:10PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 16:36:49 +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
>
> > +nwchem (6.1-5) unstable; urgency=low
> > +
> > + * Reverted subversion revisions 3824, 3834 and 3876.
> > +
> > + -- Michael Banck Fri, 14 Dec 2012 14:44:22 +01
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 21:54:05 +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> Yeah, not sure what went wront there.
>
Was too big.
> Anyway, we will prepare an upload for t-p-u.
>
I don't think that's the way to go. Nothing prevents getting fixes in
from sid.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digi
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 09:27:03PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 21:16:18 +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 09:04:39PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > Severity: normal
> > > User: release.debian@packages.deb
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 21:16:18 +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 09:04:39PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: unblock
> >
> > Please unblock package nwchem.
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 09:04:39PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package nwchem. This upload does not fix RC bugs, but it
> includes backported important fixes
6 matches
Mail list logo
