Bug#689755: bind9: memory hole in named

2012-10-09 Thread Florian Weimer
* Christoph Anton Mitterer: > On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 07:14 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: >> Have you configured a memory limit for the cache? > Which would you mean max-cache-size or max-acache-size? Not sure. I think in my days, there was max-cache-size only. > Well I think that's a design bug t

Bug#689755: bind9: memory hole in named

2012-10-08 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 07:14 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > Have you configured a memory limit for the cache? Which would you mean max-cache-size or max-acache-size? But no,... I only have max-cache-ttl and max-ncache-ttl set... > By default, there > is no limit, and records are only removed from

Bug#689755: bind9: memory hole in named

2012-10-07 Thread Florian Weimer
retitle 689755 bind9: memory leak in named thanks * Christoph Anton Mitterer: > Since some update (unfortunately I forgot which one,.. but it's at > least months ago) I experiece a memory hole in named. Have you configured a memory limit for the cache? By default, there is no limit, and records

Bug#689755: bind9: memory hole in named

2012-10-05 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Package: bind9 Version: 1:9.8.1.dfsg.P1-4.2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi. Since some update (unfortunately I forgot which one,.. but it's at least months ago) I experiece a memory hole in named. I don't see a certain way to reproduce it but it happens every week (