Bug#688512: unblock or tpu: glib2.0/2.33.12+really2.32.4-1

2012-10-14 Thread Niels Thykier
Control: tag -1 pending d-i On 2012-10-06 02:44, Josselin Mouette wrote: > I have just uploaded version 2.33.12+really2.32.4-2 because of a > security vulnerability: > > glib2.0 (2.33.12+really2.32.4-2) unstable; urgency=medium > > * Revert link adding for gdbus-object-manager-example. While i

Bug#688512: unblock or tpu: glib2.0/2.33.12+really2.32.4-1

2012-10-05 Thread Josselin Mouette
I have just uploaded version 2.33.12+really2.32.4-2 because of a security vulnerability: glib2.0 (2.33.12+really2.32.4-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Revert link adding for gdbus-object-manager-example. While it is useful to have in /usr/share/doc as an example, it must not be shipped

Bug#688512: unblock or tpu: glib2.0/2.33.12+really2.32.4-1

2012-09-28 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 28 septembre 2012 à 12:56 +0200, Niels Thykier a écrit : > The diff looks mostly reasonable, though I have one case where it seems > to me that the new version introduces a leak (see attached glib.leak). Thanks for the thorough review. I have committed a fix for the leak in our SVN a

Bug#688512: unblock or tpu: glib2.0/2.33.12+really2.32.4-1

2012-09-28 Thread Niels Thykier
Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 2012-09-25 11:03, Josselin Mouette wrote: > This bug didn’t make it through the list at first because the diff is > too large. > > Le dimanche 23 septembre 2012 à 13:16 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit : >> Package: release.debian.org >> Severity: normal >> User: rele

Bug#688512: unblock or tpu: glib2.0/2.33.12+really2.32.4-1

2012-09-25 Thread Josselin Mouette
This bug didn’t make it through the list at first because the diff is too large. Le dimanche 23 septembre 2012 à 13:16 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit : > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Hi, > > I just uploade