Ron wrote:
> So this needs to be resolved
> if there ever is anything that's to go in the distro that uses them.
> But while there isn't, it can also wait until more urgent things are
> completed too, and everything just settles down a bit in general and
> stops changing as rapidly as it currentl
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 03:30:51AM +0200, Robin Gareus wrote:
> On 07/01/2013 05:59 PM, Ron wrote:
> [..]
> > So I'm still not really sure what
> > showstopper complexity you are worried about there.
>
> Sample accurate alignment of buffered netjack streams with the rest of
> jack. updating port-l
On 07/01/2013 05:59 PM, Ron wrote:
[..]
> So I'm still not really sure what
> showstopper complexity you are worried about there.
Sample accurate alignment of buffered netjack streams with the rest of
jack. updating port-latencies,.. Sounds easy, but it's not.
The realshowstopper there is lack of
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 04:40:19PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> On 06/30/2013 03:11 AM, Ron wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I'll limit my response to the aspect of symbols, since Robin has already
> answered the other questions.
>
>
> >> Just sketching now:
> >>
> >> libopus0 will provide /usr/lib/libopus.s
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 11:15:10AM +0200, Robin Gareus wrote:
> On 06/30/2013 03:11 AM, Ron wrote:
>
> > My understanding of the background prior to that is that Robin had some
> > discussion with some of the developers at FOMS, who at the time suggested
> > the custom modes probably would be appr
On 06/30/2013 03:11 AM, Ron wrote:
Hi!
I'll limit my response to the aspect of symbols, since Robin has already
answered the other questions.
>> Just sketching now:
>>
>> libopus0 will provide /usr/lib/libopus.so.0 (business as usual)
>> libopus-custom-0 will provide /usr/lib/libopus-custom.so.
On 06/30/2013 03:11 AM, Ron wrote:
> My understanding of the background prior to that is that Robin had some
> discussion with some of the developers at FOMS, who at the time suggested
> the custom modes probably would be appropriate for the use described to
> them.
correct. derf aka Tim Terriber
Hi,
So the background (that's been missing from the BTS up until now) is
that shortly after Robin initially reported this bug, he also contacted
us upstream and we had a fairly detailed discussion on IRC about all the
various issues. Since Debian was in freeze there wasn't much going to
happen w
On 06/29/2013 05:59 PM, Robin Gareus wrote:
> To recap:
> netjack2's + opus needs libopus with --custom-modes
> but libopus on debian does not provide custom modes.
>
> Thoughts? Opinions? Volunteers?
Ron, what do you think about the following?
Instead of using embedded copies in jackd1/2, l
Quoting Robin Gareus (2013-06-29 17:59:21)
> Hi *,
>
> Ron (debian maintainer of libopus - CCed via @bugs..) ping'ed me
> yesterday to follow up on
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686777
>
> To recap:
> netjack2's + opus needs libopus with --custom-modes
> but libopus on de
Hi *,
Ron (debian maintainer of libopus - CCed via @bugs..) ping'ed me
yesterday to follow up on
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686777
To recap:
netjack2's + opus needs libopus with --custom-modes
but libopus on debian does not provide custom modes.
When enabling custom mo
11 matches
Mail list logo
