retitle 685354 unblock: sendfile/2.1b.20080616-5.2
thanks
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 05:47:05PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> H, okay. With the changelog update for the new dependencies, please
> go ahead.
Andreas uploaded sendfile 2.1b.20080616-5.2. The debdiff against wheezy is
attache
Hi Ivo,
reviewed and uploaded. Thanks for your work on this
Andreas.
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 11:17:34AM +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 09:06:07AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> Hi Andreas,
>
> > from a not so quick but untested look this seems to be reasonable to m
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 09:06:07AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Andreas,
> from a not so quick but untested look this seems to be reasonable to me.
> I could sponsor this patch but I might wait for some comment of the
> release team
Thanks for the review.
A new version of the patch is attache
On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 21:14 +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 07:56:48PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
> > -Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, openbsd-inetd | inet-superserver, perl | perl5
> > +Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, openbsd-inetd | inet-superserver, perl |
> > perl5, upda
Hi Adam,
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 07:56:48PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > The attached patch (against the version in wheezy) should do just that.
>
> Thanks for this.
Thanks for the review,
> -Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, openbsd-inetd | inet-superserver, perl | perl5
> +Depends: ${shlibs:De
On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 09:34 +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 09:39:20PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 20:51:24 +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> >
> > > The version in squeeze added a line to /etc/profile (which is a policy
> > > violation). The version
tags 685354 - moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 09:39:20PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 20:51:24 +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote:
>
> > The version in squeeze added a line to /etc/profile (which is a policy
> > violation). The version currently in wheezy removes th
Hi,
from a not so quick but untested look this seems to be reasonable to me.
I could sponsor this patch but I might wait for some comment of the
release team (or Joey but he seems uninterested in this problem - Joey,
don't you think orphaning the package makes sense?)
Kind regards and thanks to I
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 09:39:20PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 20:51:24 +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote:
>
> > The version in squeeze added a line to /etc/profile (which is a policy
> > violation). The version currently in wheezy removes that line. If this last
> > part
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 20:51:24 +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> The version in squeeze added a line to /etc/profile (which is a policy
> violation). The version currently in wheezy removes that line. If this last
> part is removed from the postinst, the line remains in /etc/profile (where it
> neve
Hi Adam,
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 02:49:24PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >>Am I reading the maintainer scripts correctly in that they modify
> >>(or at least attempt to modify) several files not shipped by the
> >>package, including /etc/services and /etc/csh.login, both of which
> >>are conffi
[re-ordered]
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 01:31:48PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 20.08.2012 07:14, Andreas Tille wrote:
>Please unblock package sendfile
>
>The RC bug #668721 was fixed in NMU and the package should migrate
to
>testing.
Am I reading the maintainer scripts correctly in that th
Hi Adam,
I admit that I basically applied the patch in the bug report and did not
thought about this issue specifically but my (re)reading exactly fits
yours. I guess we agree that this is a policy violation (not only in
the package in question but also in previous versions).
Kind regards
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 20.08.2012 07:14, Andreas Tille wrote:
Please unblock package sendfile
The RC bug #668721 was fixed in NMU and the package should migrate to
testing.
Am I reading the maintainer scripts correctly in that they modify (or
at least attempt to modify) several files
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package sendfile
The RC bug #668721 was fixed in NMU and the package should migrate to
testing.
Thanks for your work on Debian release
Andreas.
unblock sendfile/2.1
15 matches
Mail list logo
