Bug#685238: data loss on 'sort -u'

2012-09-10 Thread Colin Watson
tags 685238 patch user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com usertags 685238 ubuntu-patch quantal thanks I backported the relevant upstream patches to Ubuntu. Here's the diff I applied. This really ought to be fixed for wheezy, I think; would you mind if I NMUed for it? * Backport upstream patches to

Bug#685238: data loss on 'sort -u'

2012-08-18 Thread C de-Avillez
On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 15:14:52 -0600 Bob Proulx wrote: > found 685238 8.13-3.2 > notfound 685238 8.13-3.1ubuntu1 > thanks > > > Given this is a data loss potential, I am opening this bug for all > > affected releases (this bug affects Coreutils 8.9 onwards -- Precise > > and Quantal). I am still t

Bug#685238: data loss on 'sort -u'

2012-08-18 Thread Bob Proulx
found 685238 8.13-3.2 notfound 685238 8.13-3.1ubuntu1 thanks > Given this is a data loss potential, I am opening this bug for all > affected releases (this bug affects Coreutils 8.9 onwards -- Precise > and Quantal). I am still to run the tests on Lucid, Natty, and > Oneiric. You mean Coreutils v

Bug#685238: data loss on 'sort -u'

2012-08-18 Thread C de-Avillez
Package: coreutils Version: 8.13-3.1ubuntu1 Severity: important Original UBuntu bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug/1038468 Original Upstream bug: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=9780 Last year a bug was reported to upstream coreutils [1] about problems on using 'sort -u'. Until rec